Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Mamiya lens blurb  (Read 1620 times)
KevinA
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 770


WWW
« on: April 26, 2012, 11:26:37 AM »
ReplyReply

In the blurb for the 210 Mamiya AF ULD 210 mm f/4.0 IF  it says

• Natural focusing effect stops compression normally produced by telephoto lenses
Eh, what exactly does that mean?

Kevin.
Logged

Kevin.
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4541



« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2012, 02:19:31 PM »
ReplyReply

Marketing BS.

Michael
Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 3828



WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2012, 03:32:43 PM »
ReplyReply

Google translation?
Logged

Slobodan

My ViewBug portfolio

My Flickr site (only selected work)
Dick Roadnight
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1730


« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2012, 04:02:54 PM »
ReplyReply

In the blurb for the 210 Mamiya AF ULD 210 mm f/4.0 IF  it says

• Natural focusing effect stops compression normally produced by telephoto lenses
Eh, what exactly does that mean?

Kevin.

The natural de-focusing effect (narrow DOF) gives the impression of depth by de-focusing the background (separation from background)?

This might imply that the lens lets you get the main subject (relatively) sharp!

¿Have Mamiya lenses improved since I used them in the 1970s?
Logged

Hasselblad H4, Sinar P3 monorail view camera, Schneider Apo-digitar lenses
jsch
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 380


« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2012, 04:10:53 PM »
ReplyReply

Different lens designs have different out of focus characteristics (for example the sharpness falls off different) for the same focal length. Perhaps a marketing manager tried to translate this into an "other" language.

Best,
Johannes
Logged
yaya
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1033



WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2012, 05:19:24 PM »
ReplyReply

I'll look into it and will change it next week, thanks for the note Kevin!
Logged

Yair Shahar | Product Manager | Mamiya Leaf |
e: ysh@leaf-photography.com | m: +44(0)77 8992 8199 | www.mamiyaleaf.com |
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6661



WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2012, 06:35:55 PM »
ReplyReply

¿Have Mamiya lenses improved since I used them in the 1970s?

No, they are only usable for web size images... and even then, no value if more than 256 colors need to be used.

The H4D60 is the only camera suitable for prints larger than A4 my friend.

Cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
ondebanks
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 727


« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2012, 05:52:33 AM »
ReplyReply

¿Have Mamiya lenses improved since I used them in the 1970s?

Yes, very considerably.

I have noticed a strong correlation between lens design generation and performance, especially among the Japanese MF manufacturers. Mamiya, Bronica, Pentax and Fuji really upped their lens game from about the mid-1980s onwards. I find that those who are dismissive of say, M645 or RB67 or Pentax 67 glass, are typically talking about their experiences with some of the 1970s designs - like Dick here.

But all of the new Mamiya designs from the past 25 years or so have been excellent: all of the Mamiya 6 & Mamiya 7 lenses, the K-L RB67 lenses, the ULD wideangles and APO teles for the RB/RZ, the "A" line for the M645 (120 macro, 150/2.8, 200/2.8, 300/2.8 and 500/4.5), the ULD/APO 645AF teles (210/4, 300/4.5), the "D" 645AF lenses (45/2.8, 80/2.8, 150/2.8, 75-150/4.5). [The 28/4.5 D AF might be an exception though]. And it's important to note that the less appreciated AF lenses (like some of the wideangles) are actually old optics in a new AF casing - they're not really new designs at all, so they don't counter my argument.

That is not to say that some of the older "C" designs are not also stellar: the Mamiya 24mm ULD fisheye has never been surpassed in MF, to take one example, and used samples still command a 4-digit dollar price to this day, because it's just so damn good even on the high MP digital backs.

Ray
Logged
Dick Roadnight
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1730


« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2012, 02:05:19 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Quote from: Dick Roadnight on 26-04-2012, 22:02:54
¿Have Mamiya lenses improved since I used them in the 1970s?

Yes, very considerably.

I have noticed a strong correlation between lens design generation and performance, especially among the Japanese MF manufacturers. Mamiya, Bronica, Pentax and Fuji really upped their lens game from about the mid-1980s onwards. I find that those who are dismissive of say, M645 or RB67 or Pentax 67 glass, are typically talking about their experiences with some of the 1970s designs - like Dick here.

But all of the new Mamiya designs from the past 25 years or so have been excellent: all of the Mamiya 6 & Mamiya 7 lenses, the K-L RB67 lenses, the ULD wideangles and APO teles for the RB/RZ, the "A" line for the M645 (120 macro, 150/2.8, 200/2.8, 300/2.8 and 500/4.5), the ULD/APO 645AF teles (210/4, 300/4.5), the "D" 645AF lenses (45/2.8, 80/2.8, 150/2.8, 75-150/4.5). [The 28/4.5 D AF might be an exception though]. And it's important to note that the less appreciated AF lenses (like some of the wideangles) are actually old optics in a new AF casing - they're not really new designs at all, so they don't counter my argument.

That is not to say that some of the older "C" designs are not also stellar: the Mamiya 24mm ULD fisheye has never been surpassed in MF, to take one example, and used samples still command a 4-digit dollar price to this day, because it's just so damn good even on the high MP digital backs.

Ray

Thanks, Ray, for your constructive answer...

Hasselblad/Zeiss also made considerable improvements about that time, and my first Hasselblad system had the "new" T* multicoated lenses (they went from aluminium to black lenses at that time) which were very different to the old Mamiya C330/RB67 lenses.

Mid seventies a pro came to take some brochure shots of a "merry-tiller" on an overcast day in our vegetable garden, using RB67, pro ektachrome and a blue correction filter - his shots were washed out and blue... I used C330, Agfa CT18, 1.5deca-mired red correction filter and my picture were an order of magnitude better... but it was possible to get a (brochure) adequate picture with Mamiya glass.
Logged

Hasselblad H4, Sinar P3 monorail view camera, Schneider Apo-digitar lenses
mediumcool
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 661



« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2012, 10:51:10 PM »
ReplyReply

Nice bokeh on the 210.


Logged

FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad