Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1] 2 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Am I nuts?  (Read 2616 times)
MatthewCromer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 389


« on: April 26, 2012, 06:51:09 PM »
ReplyReply

I was standing out in the horse pasture this evening, looking at the beautiful light.  And I was thinking about taking pictures.  Which would mean running out to my car and grabbing my Alpha 65 and a big clunky (but sharp!) lens.

And I thought to myself -- I don't want all this damn dSLR / dSLT sh** to drag around any more.  I just want a NEX7 and a couple tiny little lenses.

Talk me out of this!
Logged
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4534



« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2012, 07:04:16 PM »
ReplyReply

You too huh?

Michael
Logged
John Camp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1155


« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2012, 08:53:39 PM »
ReplyReply

"Nuts" might be too harsh; of course, you'd have to be the judge of that.

If you'd said you were two thirds of the way up Half Dome, dangling from a rope, trying to decide which of your three f2.8 zooms to use, and had that thought about a Nex 7 and two tiny lenses, I'd have said, "Not nuts."

But if it's a matter of walking over to a nearby vehicle to retrieve a camera, thereby having to carry an extra pound a hundred yards across a pasture...then maybe you're just having a spasm of Gear Acquisition Syndrome. Take a couple aspirins, lie down, you'll get over it.
Logged
Colorado David
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 323


« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2012, 09:10:57 PM »
ReplyReply

I've learned to never ask a question, such as am I nuts, that can be answered yes.  Now then, I've carried full size video gear for miles through the bush.  Almost any kind of still gear is a joy to carry in comparison.
Logged
BJL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4369


« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2012, 09:13:32 PM »
ReplyReply

I just want a NEX7 and a couple tiny little lenses.
So, you want to use a NEX7 with Micro Four Thirds lenses?
Logged
MatthewCromer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 389


« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2012, 09:47:09 PM »
ReplyReply

So, you want to use a NEX7 with Micro Four Thirds lenses?

I was thinking the 16/2.8 with and without the wide angle adaptor, and the 18-55 (admittedly the last one isn't really "tiny").
Logged
MatthewCromer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 389


« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2012, 09:50:19 PM »
ReplyReply

"Nuts" might be too harsh; of course, you'd have to be the judge of that.

But if it's a matter of walking over to a nearby vehicle to retrieve a camera, thereby having to carry an extra pound a hundred yards across a pasture...then maybe you're just having a spasm of Gear Acquisition Syndrome. Take a couple aspirins, lie down, you'll get over it.

I was just regretting that I didn't have and carry my Alpha 65 and Minolta 28-135 with me.  It's too big to schlep around everywhere.
Logged
Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1165


« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2012, 10:47:31 PM »
ReplyReply

It's too big to schlep around everywhere.
Think of it as power walking with hand weights :-)
Logged
shadowblade
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


« Reply #8 on: April 27, 2012, 12:19:47 AM »
ReplyReply

Not the NEX-7, but maybe the M10, especially if it has a high-megapixel sensor and live view. Throw in some Leica tilt-shift lenses, and it'd be even better...
Logged
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9769


« Reply #9 on: April 27, 2012, 02:48:21 AM »
ReplyReply

Not the NEX-7, but maybe the M10, especially if it has a high-megapixel sensor and live view. Throw in some Leica tilt-shift lenses, and it'd be even better...




Yep, and the more you throw in the closer you get to where you started.

It's relatively easy to discipline oneself to carrying a camera with a single lens fitted. It might seem that you are cutting off your nose etc. but not really: you concentrate the mind on what you can do and then realise, perhaps to your own dismay, that it's a lot more than you'd thought, and that perhaps you have spent more on additional lenses than you should have spent... in other words, short of a professional situation, you've been had, mainly by yourself.

Rob C
Logged

shadowblade
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


« Reply #10 on: April 27, 2012, 03:17:07 AM »
ReplyReply




Yep, and the more you throw in the closer you get to where you started.

It's relatively easy to discipline oneself to carrying a camera with a single lens fitted. It might seem that you are cutting off your nose etc. but not really: you concentrate the mind on what you can do and then realise, perhaps to your own dismay, that it's a lot more than you'd thought, and that perhaps you have spent more on additional lenses than you should have spent... in other words, short of a professional situation, you've been had, mainly by yourself.

Rob C

Leica M-series with Tri-Elmar 16-18-21. Almost fits in a pocket, and you don't lose any image quality compared to a DSLR.
Logged
RazorTM
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 54


WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 27, 2012, 03:39:50 AM »
ReplyReply

I thought that artists were supposed to suffer for the sake of art?
Logged
KevinA
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 762


WWW
« Reply #12 on: April 27, 2012, 04:20:49 AM »
ReplyReply

I had 7 rolls of film kicking around that needed processing, so I dropped them in the post. I realised on return one roll I shot at the end of job in February. The job I did on the 1DsmksIII, it was a clear sunny winters day over London. I struggled with the light, the DR of the Canon was severely lacking, still I processed the best I could sent them off with an invoice and got paid.
Now the roll I shot that day what do I see when it's scanned, beautiful shadows, lovely highlights and a winters glow to the scene, looking back the digital is very poor, if 20 years ago someone made a film that worked like this no one would of bought it.
So for me I would like to say I'm done with all these DSLR's, I just want my Rolleiflex and a pocket full of Portra film.
Now I really am nuts.

Kevin.
Logged

Kevin.
KevinA
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 762


WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 27, 2012, 04:22:38 AM »
ReplyReply

Not the NEX-7, but maybe the M10, especially if it has a high-megapixel sensor and live view. Throw in some Leica tilt-shift lenses, and it'd be even better...
Is that scheduled for Planet Earth?
Logged

Kevin.
MarkL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 283


« Reply #14 on: April 27, 2012, 05:18:19 AM »
ReplyReply

Crazy? No. Lazy? Probably Smiley

It all depends on how seriously you take your photography I guess. After getting up at 3am, driving and hiking for hours for just the chance of getting 'the shot' or location scouting, mood boards, building relationships, getting a team together, model casting walking to a car and walking back with a few kg of gear is nothing. Spending money is the easy bit.
Logged
KLaban
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1231



WWW
« Reply #15 on: April 27, 2012, 07:23:10 AM »
ReplyReply

Is that scheduled for Planet Earth?

Well, not the bit about the tilt-shift lenses, but I'd be surprised if the rest wasn't.

The M10 is likely to have a CMOS sensor and if it does then Liveview and a high res screen would be a no brainer.

Sounds good.

Logged

Chris Pollock
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 213


« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2012, 07:24:48 AM »
ReplyReply

I'm at the stage where I don't worry about carrying my gear around, I worry about fitting it within my baggage allowance when I go overseas.
Logged
MatthewCromer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 389


« Reply #17 on: April 27, 2012, 08:12:17 AM »
ReplyReply

Crazy? No. Lazy? Probably Smiley

It all depends on how seriously you take your photography I guess. After getting up at 3am, driving and hiking for hours for just the chance of getting 'the shot' or location scouting, mood boards, building relationships, getting a team together, model casting walking to a car and walking back with a few kg of gear is nothing. Spending money is the easy bit.

So Mark I can assume your camera and lenses are sitting in a bag hanging from your shoulder right now?   ;-)
Logged
Ellis Vener
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: leet



WWW
« Reply #18 on: April 27, 2012, 09:07:00 AM »
ReplyReply

I was standing out in the horse pasture this evening, looking at the beautiful light.  And I was thinking about taking pictures.  Which would mean running out to my car and grabbing my Alpha 65 and a big clunky (but sharp!) lens.

And I thought to myself -- I don't want all this damn dSLR / dSLT sh** to drag around any more.  I just want a NEX7 and a couple tiny little lenses.

Talk me out of this!
Horses for courses. One tool does not fit all. There's a time and a place for everything....And I'm sure there are a slew of other cliches that fit.
Logged

Ellis Vener
http://www.ellisvener.com
Creating photographs for advertising, corporate and industrial clients since 1984.
snoleoprd
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 228



WWW
« Reply #19 on: April 27, 2012, 11:53:04 AM »
ReplyReply

I was standing out in the horse pasture this evening, looking at the beautiful light.  And I was thinking about taking pictures.  Which would mean running out to my car and grabbing my Alpha 65 and a big clunky (but sharp!) lens.

And I thought to myself -- I don't want all this damn dSLR / dSLT sh** to drag around any more.  I just want a NEX7 and a couple tiny little lenses.

Talk me out of this!

No not nuts, maybe aging, but at least that is my excuse. I got to the point where I was not shooting as much because I did not always want to drag a big bag or backpack around, I tried carrying less lenses but it was still a lot of weight. Then I found the X-Pro 1 and it has great image quality, great prime lenses and it is light and easy to carry, so now I have it with me almost all the time. Now I want to go out and see what I can find, then it makes getting the dslr out less of chore when I really want it there. So for me it was a nice addition.....

Alan
Logged

Alan Smallbone
Orange County, CA
Pages: [1] 2 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad