Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: FS. Ashi Super Tak.Lens  (Read 1821 times)
douvidl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 156


« on: April 30, 2012, 09:53:18 AM »
ReplyReply

I have two Super Tak lens.

1. 300mm, f4.  comes with front & rear caps, and tripod collar.  The glass appears to be clean and free of blemish, to my eyes.  The focus is smooth. The body is very clean and show no damage.  And it comes with an EOS adaptor.

2.  28mm, f3.5, comes with front and rear caps. The glass appears to be clean free of blemish, to my eyes. The focus is smooth and the body is very clean and comes with an EOS adaptor.

I can no longer use manual lens due to an uncooperative body. Please contact me for any other info.

I would like to get $125 for both lens, buyer pays shipping.

Logged
stevebri
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 159


« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2012, 12:09:45 PM »
ReplyReply

Hi,
Sorry for my ignorance, are these for the 67 or 645...?

If so I'm interested.

Steve
Logged
douvidl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 156


« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2012, 03:32:33 PM »
ReplyReply

Steve
I'm sorry but what is the 67 or 645...?  I don't understand the question.
David
Logged
stevebri
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 159


« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2012, 04:56:37 PM »
ReplyReply

Hi,

Pentax made both 6x7 and 645 medium format cameras as well
Here is a brief part of their history relating to the Pentax 67.

"In 1969, Pentax introduced the 35, 55, 75, 105, 150, 200, 300, 400, 600, 800 lenses labeled "Super Takumars." 1971 saw improved lens coatings and a name change to "Super-Multi-Coated Takumars." The 90 LS, 135, 500 and 1000 lenses were also added to the line.

Are yours for a 35mm K-mount....?

Best,

Steve
Logged
douvidl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 156


« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2012, 10:26:39 PM »
ReplyReply

Steve;
The 28mm is labeled "Super Multi Coated"
The 300 is labeled "Super Takumar"

But both take the same EOS adaptor, so the both must have the same mount.
The rear lens is a screw mount.
Does that help?
I can provide the lens number if that would help.

David
Logged
mediumcool
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 672



« Reply #5 on: May 01, 2012, 09:03:11 AM »
ReplyReply

Steve;
The 28mm is labeled "Super Multi Coated"
The 300 is labeled "Super Takumar"

But both take the same EOS adaptor, so the both must have the same mount.
The rear lens is a screw mount.
Does that help?
I can provide the lens number if that would help.

David

42mm thread, as in M42.
Logged

FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool
douvidl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 156


« Reply #6 on: May 01, 2012, 09:12:44 AM »
ReplyReply

Steve;
I am not sure what you are saying.  Perhaps you could tell me what camera you plan to use with the Taks.
Right now I'm very confused.  I think the issue is getting the right adaptor to fit the lens to the camera.
David
Logged
mediumcool
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 672



« Reply #7 on: May 01, 2012, 09:36:21 AM »
ReplyReply

Steve;
I am not sure what you are saying.  Perhaps you could tell me what camera you plan to use with the Taks.
Right now I'm very confused.  I think the issue is getting the right adaptor to fit the lens to the camera.
David

Steve assumed that they are medium-format (120 film) lenses. The mention of the 28/3.5 should be sufficient to alert a reader to the fact that that at least one of them is for 35mm cameras. Though we can all become tired and even emotional, depending on the time of day/night and the situation!

 Grin
Logged

FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool
douvidl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 156


« Reply #8 on: May 01, 2012, 01:11:41 PM »
ReplyReply

Who asked you?  Your response was less than helpful. And somewhat meaningless.
Logged
douvidl
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 156


« Reply #9 on: May 01, 2012, 01:14:19 PM »
ReplyReply

Steve
The adaptor I've used for the lens was an M42 mount.  Does that help?
David
Logged
mediumcool
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 672



« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2012, 06:32:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Who asked you?  Your response was less than helpful. And somewhat meaningless.

Who asked me? Rhetorical in the extreme, but letís say, again rhetorically, that the Gods of Clarity and Reason were responsible.

Your first four posts contained a dearth of information; I mentioned M42 at 09:03:11, and then [coincidentally?] you did too, at 01:14:19. So my contribution was less than helpful? Meaningless?

Iíll not respond to your posts in the future, if that makes you feel better. It will certainly make me feel better.  Grin
Logged

FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool
stevebri
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 159


« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2012, 12:17:17 PM »
ReplyReply

I did assume ( and it was late) then on checking and on slowly using the rest of my brain realised these lenses are exactly as medium cool said.

I must back him here,  ( m cool!) he is a solid guy, very helpful...always,both on here and on get dpi.

He was being helpful and informative with his acquired knowledge and I, along with many others are grateful.

Douvidl.
Not knowing a 67 from a 645 from a k mount from an m42 suggests you should sit next to him more often at parties....

Steve
Logged
mediumcool
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 672



« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2012, 08:46:51 PM »
ReplyReply

I did assume ( and it was late) then on checking and on slowly using the rest of my brain realised these lenses are exactly as medium cool said.

I must back him here,  ( m cool!) he is a solid guy, very helpful...always,both on here and on get dpi.

He was being helpful and informative with his acquired knowledge and I, along with many others are grateful.

Douvidl.
Not knowing a 67 from a 645 from a k mount from an m42 suggests you should sit next to him more often at parties....

Steve

Rather sit next to you, Steve!  Grin
Logged

FaceBook facebook.com/ian.goss.39   www.mlkshk.com/user/mediumcool
stevebri
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 159


« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2012, 01:48:39 PM »
ReplyReply

 Wink Wink
Drinks are on me Grin

Steve
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad