Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: A Landscape  (Read 524 times)
amolitor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 801


WWW
« on: May 11, 2012, 08:58:48 AM »
ReplyReply

This is a photograph of a print, so the sky is slightly messed up. There was some glare which I edited "out" to a degree. That's what the weird more-or-less vertical streaky crap is. Anyways, this gives a fair idea of the print but is not as good as the print.

Logged

- Andrew

My awesome blog about photography: http://photothunk.blogspot.com
John R Smith
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1357


Still crazy, after all these years


« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2012, 12:41:13 PM »
ReplyReply


So why did you take a photograph of a print?

(Rather than scanning the print - better idea - or scanning the negative and re-working it in LR or whatever - even better)

John
Logged

Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
and a case full of (very old) lenses and other bits
amolitor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 801


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2012, 12:56:50 PM »
ReplyReply

Because I don't have a scanner.
Logged

- Andrew

My awesome blog about photography: http://photothunk.blogspot.com
John R Smith
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1357


Still crazy, after all these years


« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2012, 03:09:25 PM »
ReplyReply


Well, I've got a scanner which works really well sitting on the desk beside me. It's part of an Epson all-in-one printer/scanner/copier, and it cost me all of 35 in my local supermarket. What I'm saying is, cost is not an issue . . .

John
Logged

Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
and a case full of (very old) lenses and other bits
James Billett
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 16


WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2012, 05:17:07 AM »
ReplyReply

Looks to be a fair print - although it's very hard to tell when your looking at a photograph of a photograph Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad