Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: which one?  (Read 715 times)
armand
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 890



« on: August 09, 2012, 09:41:09 AM »
ReplyReply

which one do you prefer, if any? they are in order, minimally corrected, somehow corrected, mostly corrected.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2012, 09:52:23 AM by armand » Logged
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6819


« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2012, 10:26:47 AM »
ReplyReply

Personally, I prefer the uncorrected images. I find them much more dynamic than the more corrected one. I would need more time to decide between the "somewhat" and the "minimally" images but now, the "minimally" corrected photo gets my preference.
Logged

Francois
shutterpup
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 490


« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2012, 11:30:17 AM »
ReplyReply

Personally, I prefer the uncorrected images. I find them much more dynamic than the more corrected one. I would need more time to decide between the "somewhat" and the "minimally" images but now, the "minimally" corrected photo gets my preference.

Me too. And the minimally corrected one gets my vote as well.
Logged
jule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 738


WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2012, 09:46:35 PM »
ReplyReply

which one do you prefer, if any? they are in order, minimally corrected, somehow corrected, mostly corrected.
I like the first one..minimally corrected because it seems to ahve more 'energy'. Now I can't fully expain the term 'energy'.... but it seems to be more - dynamic/fluid/have more mo-jo.  (and I can't describe mo-jo either; but for those whose native language is English, you may have an appreciation of what I am trying to describe ... Smiley )

The others seem more restrained and stilted.

Julie
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7961



WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2012, 10:58:56 PM »
ReplyReply

I hate siding with the majority, but I too prefer the minimal one.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
armand
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 890



« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2012, 08:25:13 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for the replies. That's how I felt also but I recall some people being quite into perspective correction, tilt-shift lenses and all that stuff and I was curious how the majority thinks like.
Logged
luxborealis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1098



WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2012, 10:19:51 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for the replies. That's how I felt also but I recall some people being quite into perspective correction, tilt-shift lenses and all that stuff and I was curious how the majority thinks like.

I'm with the top one, as well. Although if I didn't have it to compare to, the middle one would also work. In this case, the movement created by the uncorrected perspective adds to the photo. The bottom one is too static. While there is a case to be made for tilt-shift, this image seems to work better uncorrected.
Logged

Terry McDonald
Revealing the art inherent in nature
- visit luxBorealis.com.
Have a read of my PhotoBlog and subscribe!
cmi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 491


« Reply #7 on: August 16, 2012, 06:20:02 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for the replies. That's how I felt also but I recall some people being quite into perspective correction, tilt-shift lenses and all that stuff and I was curious how the majority thinks like.

The perspective upwards is fine and makes the image work. What disturbs me is this tilt of the vertical lines to the right. It is marginal, works against that upwards perspective, and more visible in the first image. I probably would either make it stronger or remove it.
 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad