Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1] 2 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: The Effect of Colour.  (Read 6612 times)
jule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 738


WWW
« on: August 18, 2012, 01:42:10 AM »
ReplyReply

I thought I would share with everyone a post I made on my blog recently about something quite interesting I noticed about the effect that colour has on an image.

I found it fascinating in the images below that I thought they seemed to be in a different position and at different angles – but they are exactly the same image… just with different colour - or lack of.

Amazing what the mind does hey!!!


Julie

Logged

bill t.
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2693


WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2012, 03:14:36 AM »
ReplyReply

The mono version has a lot more weight at the bottom because overall density there is much higher, the shadow areas on the porch have fallen into very deep shadows.  The green coloration itself fills in the shadows and therefore lightens up that area.  Perhaps it all comes down to visual weight.  Would be interesting to see how different approaches to monochrome conversion would influence the effect, such as if green was converted to a much higher gray value.

If I cover one of the images and look at them one at a time, while trying to remember the other, I don't get the same impression.

Makes me think I need to go back and read up on color theory.  Another similarly striking thing is how having complimentary colors in the scene can add snap to both colors, even when the area covered by one is very small.  If you selectively desaturate just one of the colors, they both lose impact.  But wait, there's more...
Logged
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6208



WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2012, 12:22:58 PM »
ReplyReply

Julie, The house is green. Green is a receding color. It gives the impression that it's farther away than what surrounds it. I just made another post, answering Rob, that talks about the same thing: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=69802.msg553598#new

With color ya gotta be careful or you'll get all sorts of effects you didn't expect.
Logged

jule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 738


WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2012, 04:11:47 PM »
ReplyReply

Julie, The house is green. Green is a receding color. It gives the impression that it's farther away than what surrounds it. I just made another post, answering Rob, that talks about the same thing: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=69802.msg553598#new

With color ya gotta be careful or you'll get all sorts of effects you didn't expect.

That's what i realised Russ when looking at both these images side my side. They just seem to be at different angles and positions ... does my head in!

Julie
Logged

bill t.
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2693


WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2012, 01:41:22 AM »
ReplyReply

There may be something other than color at work here.

Edit...the mono image is a simple Desaturate of the color image.

And Michael has a good introduction to color issues right here on LuLa!


« Last Edit: August 22, 2012, 01:46:23 AM by bill t. » Logged
jule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 738


WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 23, 2012, 05:58:04 AM »
ReplyReply

There may be something other than color at work here.

Edit...the mono image is a simple Desaturate of the color image.

And Michael has a good introduction to color issues right here on LuLa!



Thanks Bill for the link to Michael's article. It was really interesting.

I still however don't understand why the buildings look like they are at completely different angles and leaning in different positions. :-)

Julie

Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #6 on: August 23, 2012, 07:07:19 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks Bill for the link to Michael's article. It was really interesting.

I still however don't understand why the buildings look like they are at completely different angles and leaning in different positions. :-)Julie




Of course you don't Julie, and nobody else has a clue either. I long ago gave up trying to rationalise or understand everything that goes down in this world. Things happen without any logical explanation; you are up one day and down he next; it's the nature of the beast. Better to accept and just go with your internal flow, ignoring what you can't fix or change. It's the only route that's starting to make sense to me late in life. Not wanting to divert this in any manner, but it brings me to consider my local friend here who's continuing with his tobacco and booze even though he's got cancer of the mouth. Is he right or is he wrong? Ultimately, the answer is his to understand, not mine nor anyone else's to propose.

However, the reason why you see this effect with the two images is this:

Ciao -

Rob C
Logged

jule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 738


WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 23, 2012, 05:06:22 PM »
ReplyReply


Of course you don't Julie, and nobody else has a clue either. I long ago gave up trying to rationalise or understand everything that goes down in this world. Things happen without any logical explanation; you are up one day and down he next; it's the nature of the beast. Better to accept and just go with your internal flow, ignoring what you can't fix or change. It's the only route that's starting to make sense to me late in life. Not wanting to divert this in any manner, but it brings me to consider my local friend here who's continuing with his tobacco and booze even though he's got cancer of the mouth. Is he right or is he wrong? Ultimately, the answer is his to understand, not mine nor anyone else's to propose.

However, the reason why you see this effect with the two images is this:

Ciao -

Rob C

..... so in actual fact... I should just enjoy having my head played with... :-) and don't even think about asking why. I like that idea!!

Julie
Logged

Kirk Gittings
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1547


WWW
« Reply #8 on: August 23, 2012, 05:17:35 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
I found it fascinating in the images below that I thought they seemed to be in a different position and at different angles –

Not to me.........only tonal density (as i would expect the color to translate) seems different.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2012, 05:19:29 PM by Kirk Gittings » Logged

Thanks,
Kirk

Kirk Gittings
Architecture and Landscape Photography
WWW.GITTINGSPHOTO.COM

LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)
jule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 738


WWW
« Reply #9 on: August 23, 2012, 05:24:26 PM »
ReplyReply

Not to me.........only tonal density (as i would expect the color to translate) seems different.

oh well.. must just be only my head .... LOL
Logged

WalterEG
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1155


« Reply #10 on: August 23, 2012, 06:38:18 PM »
ReplyReply

Jule,

I see very clearly what you are seeing but I can't for the life of me explain it.

Logged
jule
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 738


WWW
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2012, 06:49:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Jule,

I see very clearly what you are seeing but I can't for the life of me explain it.


I suppose both you and I Walter can just enjoy it hey, and having our heads playeed with by visual perception... and don't worry about explaining it! :-)
Logged

petermfiore
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510



WWW
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2012, 07:56:28 PM »
ReplyReply

Color when high in chroma (saturation) appears to be a lighter value than it actually is. For example a cadmium red medium straight out of the tube is very high in chroma and lies at value 5 on a gray scale.  This is a very difficult concept for painting students to grasp, but a must to able to control one's palette.

Peter



www.peterfiore.com
« Last Edit: August 23, 2012, 08:37:27 PM by petermfiore » Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #13 on: August 24, 2012, 03:26:44 AM »
ReplyReply

oh well.. must just be only my head .... LOL


No, it isn't Julie; it's also in mine as well as, I note, Walter's head too.

Just enjoy the magic of photography. Apart from minor distractions into politics, religion, sex, economics (all of these are full of people with high qualifications and no real understanding whatsoever) there's no reason we can't enjoy the world of pictures too! Of course, that's also chock-full of people without understanding, but hey, I find the company helps me feel just as qualified in all fields as the next guy.

;-)

Rob C
Logged

Ray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8878


« Reply #14 on: August 24, 2012, 09:54:48 AM »
ReplyReply

The images look the same to me also (regards position and perspective), once one has adjusted the shadows so the same amount of detail is visible in both the color and B&W version, as in Bill t's adjustment.

You're getting excited over nothing, Jule.  Grin
Logged
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7909



WWW
« Reply #15 on: August 24, 2012, 11:05:53 AM »
ReplyReply

The perspective looks the same to me, too. But then I'm "color-blind" (common garden variety so-called Red-Green version), so my eyes naturally use luminance as the first source of information and color second. The green house looks lighter than the gray one, but otherwise the same.

So I wonder: Kirk and Ray -- you don't have deficient color vision, too, do you?
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
jeremypayne
Guest
« Reply #16 on: August 24, 2012, 04:37:31 PM »
ReplyReply

oh well.. must just be only my head .... LOL

I see it. 
Logged
Ray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8878


« Reply #17 on: August 24, 2012, 09:30:57 PM »
ReplyReply

The perspective looks the same to me, too. But then I'm "color-blind" (common garden variety so-called Red-Green version), so my eyes naturally use luminance as the first source of information and color second. The green house looks lighter than the gray one, but otherwise the same.

So I wonder: Kirk and Ray -- you don't have deficient color vision, too, do you?


Not aware of any difficiencies in my color vision, Eric. The B&W image as presented by Julie has deeper shadows than the color version, which seems to contribute in some small way to a perception of some slight  difference in angles. The corrected B&W image from Bill t results in both images looking identical with regard to angles and perspective, although the mood created by the two images is slightly different. B&W tends to be more sombre. Color more cheerful.

ps. On second thoughts and third impressions, I do see a slight difference in the appearance of a vertical angle. The nearest vertical corner of the house, immediately above the printed sign on the fence, seems to be very slightly less forward leaning in the color version. In the B&W version, the top of that corner where the fenced balcony is, gives the impression of being slightly closer to the viewer, as though the corner of the house is leaning slightly more towards the viewer.
« Last Edit: August 24, 2012, 10:33:54 PM by Ray » Logged
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #18 on: August 25, 2012, 03:10:55 AM »
ReplyReply

Not aware of any difficiencies in my color vision, Eric. The B&W image as presented by Julie has deeper shadows than the color version, which seems to contribute in some small way to a perception of some slight  difference in angles. The corrected B&W image from Bill t results in both images looking identical with regard to angles and perspective, although the mood created by the two images is slightly different. B&W tends to be more sombre. Color more cheerful.

ps. On second thoughts and third impressions, I do see a slight difference in the appearance of a vertical angle. The nearest vertical corner of the house, immediately above the printed sign on the fence, seems to be very slightly less forward leaning in the color version. In the B&W version, the top of that corner where the fenced balcony is, gives the impression of being slightly closer to the viewer, as though the corner of the house is leaning slightly more towards the viewer.



QE,Julie,D

;-)

Rob C
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7909



WWW
« Reply #19 on: August 25, 2012, 07:52:26 AM »
ReplyReply

Yeah, if I just focus on that one corner, it looks a little bit weird. So maybe my color vision isn't that bad.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Pages: [1] 2 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad