Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 52 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Sigma DP2 Merrill Experiences  (Read 241670 times)
ndevlin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 504



WWW
« Reply #160 on: October 08, 2012, 05:47:28 PM »
ReplyReply

ndelvin !! this is a declaration of love  Grin I feel you about to crack Wink

Oh I cracked when I saw the files off a few test frames I shot when we were in Algonquin last week.  Just add another grand to the ledger of how much my friendship with Michael has cost me  Cheesy Grin

Seeing is believing.  I do wish the D1M was as good, but I'm not totally convinced.

- N.
Logged

Nick Devlin   @onelittlecamera
BarbaraArmstrong
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 288


« Reply #161 on: October 08, 2012, 07:38:21 PM »
ReplyReply

Just a reaction to KirbyKrieger's comments.  This camera is not slow-to-use; it is slow to process the files after you have used it.  If you don't have needs that exceed the capabilities of the buffer, you are good-to-go.  Also, I don't find the files awkward to use.  I easily and quickly convert the raws to tiffs in the Sigma software (this is indeed quick and easy), directing them to the same folder alongside the original jpgs and raws.  From there I import any files I want to use to either ACR via Bridge or right into Photoshop.  The files are so nice that very little editing is needed.  The files are real gems. --Barbara
Logged
ndevlin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 504



WWW
« Reply #162 on: October 08, 2012, 07:54:22 PM »
ReplyReply


I have to echo what Barbara says about ease of processing. SPP is crappy, but frankly I didn't find there was much to do beyond dialing-down the sharpening, setting WB and dark/light clipping points. These things SPP can do alright. Then it's over to LR. 

Not an ideal workflow, but not something that would keep one from using the camera.

- N.
Logged

Nick Devlin   @onelittlecamera
NigelC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 515


« Reply #163 on: October 09, 2012, 04:25:40 AM »
ReplyReply

The buffer is the bugger, not the card.  I've used 30, 45, and 90 MB/s cards and can't tell any difference, even with drive mode at "as fast as possible".

Fwiw, there is very little about the camera that would encourage me to use it for action photography.  It is a relatively slow-to-use camera that has many of what are politely called "quirks", and makes files that are awkward to use well.  I see nothing about it that rewards creating excess data.

The buffer holds 7 RAW exposures.  If your situation requires that you shoot in bursts of more than 7, or more bursts than maybe one every minute (don't have a figure), this is (vigorously) not the camera for that situation.

RAW files are mostly c. 45 MB.

No this will used mostly on tripod one shot at a time.  I just wondered whether type of card had a bearing on write speed - I once had an Olympus 8080 that took 15 secs to write a raw file before you could take another shot - bit annoying really!
Logged
idillic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 20


« Reply #164 on: October 09, 2012, 07:40:27 AM »
ReplyReply

.... dialing-down the sharpening, setting WB and dark/light clipping points......

Could you explain how SPP sets a dark clipping point? (apologies if this is a silly question)
Logged
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4788



« Reply #165 on: October 09, 2012, 08:16:39 AM »
ReplyReply

The card has little to do with the delay. It's internal processing not writing that is the bottleneck.

Michael
Logged
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4788



« Reply #166 on: October 09, 2012, 08:19:08 AM »
ReplyReply

Turn on the clipping indicator, set white balance, sharpening if you wish, and then use the exposure sliders to set maximum white and black without clipping. (Having a proper original exposure really helps). It's like scanning a transparency. You simply want to capture as much "real" data as possible.

Export as a 16 bit TIFF in Prophoto RGB and Bon's your uncle.

Michael
Logged
Hulyss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 491



WWW
« Reply #167 on: October 10, 2012, 10:38:35 AM »
ReplyReply

Good B&W Michael Rozynski Smiley

More Candy for ppl who want it Wink





Logged

Kind Regards - www.hulyssbowman.com
TMARK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1834


« Reply #168 on: October 10, 2012, 11:06:16 AM »
ReplyReply

I wish you guys and gals would stop posting images.  I don't want to spend any cash right now.

Before I take the plunge, how is it for street photography?  I'm thinking of using the OVF.  I'm a Leica M guy who never really got on with the X100's MF, but loved the images.  Thoughts?

Thanks in advance!
Logged
NancyP
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 814


« Reply #169 on: October 10, 2012, 04:56:22 PM »
ReplyReply

 Wink   Yup. More good intentions down the drain. Still, I currently have only one camera body, the Canon 60D, so it isn't unreasonable to get a second camera...... FWIW, the lens hood, extra batteries, and external optical viewfinder are on back order, but the closeup lens and circular polarizer filter are in stock. Now I am counting the days until the camera arrives....   Cheesy
Logged
Rand47
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 546


« Reply #170 on: October 10, 2012, 06:29:23 PM »
ReplyReply

OK, now I'm a gonner . . .  but where to buy?  B&H on backorder.
Has anyone purchased directly from Sigma (same pricing as far as I can tell)?
Does Sigma have stock?

Thanks for any insight.  
Rand
Logged
BarbaraArmstrong
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 288


« Reply #171 on: October 10, 2012, 06:46:51 PM »
ReplyReply

I don't know if Sigma has stock right now, but that is where I have made my purchases.  --Barbara
Logged
jimgoldring
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


« Reply #172 on: October 10, 2012, 07:18:38 PM »
ReplyReply

Sigma has stock. I ordered online over the weekend and a DP2 Merrill arrives tomorrow.

Jim
Logged
Hulyss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 491



WWW
« Reply #173 on: October 11, 2012, 05:34:58 AM »
ReplyReply

I'm very happy to share with ppl who understand how work this machine (not like in my country where trolls want to annihilate every foveon threads). As you seen, the DP2 Merrill is not really human friendly (skin) but I'm sure most of you know what this kind of details can bring at a PP level. This sharpness give a large amplitude in PP work.

More ppl will use it extensively, more you will see what Michael mean when he say "this camera is not for Sisi'sWink







Logged

Kind Regards - www.hulyssbowman.com
joezl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 16


« Reply #174 on: October 11, 2012, 10:18:24 AM »
ReplyReply

I'm very curious about this camera. Has anyone compared the raw files with the Fuji x-Pro1 raw files? I'm trying to decide between the two cameras. My prints are 24 x 30 inches and larger, usually from stitched files out of a Canon 5D2. Any help would be much appreciated.
Logged
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #175 on: October 11, 2012, 10:23:18 AM »
ReplyReply

Looking at the portrait of the girl with the sunglasses, though her facial skin doesn't look too bad, her right arm (left of pic) has a horrid chalky look to it that I last saw from four-colour litho printing machine proofs in the 80s!

I really do understand that for people shooters, as has been indicated elsewhere, this sensor may not offer an ideal solution. This leads me to wonder: if we recognize failures in skin because we are so familar with it, how much failure does it hide in other subjects which we are less familar with to the extent that we don't notice? That we don't notice may not be justification enough.

However, as with everyone else here. I'm more than impressed with the detail and how it stands up to onscreen enlargement.

Rob C
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 5659



WWW
« Reply #176 on: October 11, 2012, 11:29:37 AM »
ReplyReply

Looking at the portrait of the girl with the sunglasses, though her facial skin doesn't look too bad, her right arm (left of pic) has a horrid chalky look to it that I last saw from four-colour litho printing machine proofs in the 80s!

I really do understand that for people shooters, as has been indicated elsewhere, this sensor may not offer an ideal solution. This leads me to wonder: if we recognize failures in skin because we are so familar with it, how much failure does it hide in other subjects which we are less familar with to the extent that we don't notice?...

Can somebody please post a picture of a girl with (naturally) red/pink (instead of orange) lips? Pretty please?
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
ndevlin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 504



WWW
« Reply #177 on: October 11, 2012, 11:50:08 AM »
ReplyReply

I'm very curious about this camera. Has anyone compared the raw files with the Fuji x-Pro1 raw files? I'm trying to decide between the two cameras. My prints are 24 x 30 inches and larger, usually from stitched files out of a Canon 5D2. Any help would be much appreciated.

Very different cameras. I have shot with both recently (the X-E1 actually), but not side-by-side.  For what it's worth, the Fujis are much better cameras - as cameras. They will also provide amazing IQ at ISOs up to 6400.  The Sigma is more of a base-ISO beast.

The Fuji also produces superb jpegs, especially with skin tones. The Sigma is a RAW-only proposition.

In absolute terms, however, under ideal circumstances, the Sigma will produce a more detailed image.

Think of it like this: the Simga is a mini tech-camera with a fixed lens.  The Fuji is a modern system-DSLR type camera by comparison. Personally, I will end up with a Sigma and keep my Fuji X100, but continue to be tempted on the "X" series.

- N.


Logged

Nick Devlin   @onelittlecamera
Hulyss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 491



WWW
« Reply #178 on: October 11, 2012, 11:56:41 AM »
ReplyReply

I'm 100% OK WITH Nick statement.
« Last Edit: October 12, 2012, 04:01:40 AM by Hulyss » Logged

Kind Regards - www.hulyssbowman.com
joezl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 16


« Reply #179 on: October 11, 2012, 12:39:28 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks ndevlin. That's what I construed from all of the DPM2 files I've seen posted, though, judging image quality online is not something I put much confidence in. Having said that, the DPM2 files do have a hard to define reversal film like quality about them that I quite like. I tend to tolerate a lot of hassles if it means yielding the highest possible image quality. Thanks for your reply.
Logged
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 52 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad