Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 52 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Sigma DP2 Merrill Experiences  (Read 235870 times)
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7781



WWW
« Reply #400 on: November 04, 2012, 06:17:22 PM »
ReplyReply

Now seriously, do you think anyone here is capable of being objective ?

Bernard you're a highly accomplished photographer. You lost objectivity about equipment years ago or you wouldn't have the portfolio that you do. You, like all of us with years of experience, have strong preferences and biases based on that experience. And thankfully so.

Sure, you are of course correct.

My point was merely that the DP2m is a new camera to me, I am privately and publicly neutral about it and have no agenda at all. I didn't spend that much money on it but still enough money that I would like it to deliver value. I like the form factor, but have at least 2 alternatives that work well for me also.

Now, I do indeed have experience using a wide variety of equipment and I have come to assume certain characteristics as granted. Some is my personal preference, some is simply a measure of the level reached by other cameras.

In the end the only thing that really matters is my satisfaction in terms of being able to produce images I am happy about in a reasonnable amount of time.

Previous comments had led me to think that this thread was about that, but I got a lot more answers to my mention of short battery life than to the post where I linked to 3 high res images... So I am not that certain anymore. Smiley

Cheers,
Bernard
« Last Edit: November 04, 2012, 07:37:10 PM by BernardLanguillier » Logged

A few images online here!
ndevlin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 504



WWW
« Reply #401 on: November 04, 2012, 07:39:28 PM »
ReplyReply

Bernard, I think you, like me, may have found a new friend in this little camera.

Yup, the battery life sucks/is a joke, but we will all make due around that.

Cheers,

- N.

ps. gee, I wish I were in japan...it's so lovely there in the fall.
Logged

Nick Devlin   @onelittlecamera
idillic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 20


« Reply #402 on: November 04, 2012, 08:22:17 PM »
ReplyReply

I had a drive in the country yesterday & late in the afternoon I took this with the DP2M.  I quite liked the paddock with the rapeseed flowers on the ridge line.
There are quite a few bald hills around this area north west of Ballarat.  The 100% crop with the magpie & the sheep in the distance gives one an idea of the scale.
Logged
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7781



WWW
« Reply #403 on: November 04, 2012, 09:02:50 PM »
ReplyReply

Bernard, I think you, like me, may have found a new friend in this little camera.

Yup, the battery life sucks/is a joke, but we will all make due around that.

Cheers,

- N.

ps. gee, I wish I were in japan...it's so lovely there in the fall.

Yes, exactly.  Smiley

Cheers,
Bernard

p.s.: yep, still a bit early in Tokyo overall, but it seems that the Japanese Alps got some of the best fall colors in the last century... and I couldn't go...  Sad
Logged

A few images online here!
Foveonic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« Reply #404 on: November 04, 2012, 11:46:57 PM »
ReplyReply

 Wish I were in Japan too...
« Last Edit: November 04, 2012, 11:48:50 PM by Foveonic » Logged
Hulyss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 490



WWW
« Reply #405 on: November 05, 2012, 06:02:07 AM »
ReplyReply

Nice Windows background screen dear idillic Smiley

Death and the Maiden - Again at ISO 1000, hand held.

At first I did this photo with my D700 + Zeiss glass ... but I did the same just after with the DP2 Merrill, as a test at High ISO. This photo have for me the same charm as the other. It is different, more pictural, already deteriorated by a natural grain.

I think you should try High ISO with the M. It have something, for real.





At 1600 by my assistant :

« Last Edit: November 05, 2012, 09:27:32 AM by Hulyss » Logged

Kind Regards - www.hulyssbowman.com
idillic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 20


« Reply #406 on: November 05, 2012, 06:19:57 AM »
ReplyReply

Another Wind ows background Grin ...this one was earlier in the day with the DP1M

Logged
Hulyss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 490



WWW
« Reply #407 on: November 05, 2012, 10:10:46 AM »
ReplyReply

It is not just you Smiley I see it. Look like the stone man in Fantastic Four. A stone troll !

The DP2 Merrill is an esoteric camera ! Wink
Logged

Kind Regards - www.hulyssbowman.com
Rand47
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 542


« Reply #408 on: November 05, 2012, 12:19:17 PM »
ReplyReply

Point Lobos, CA

Logged
AlfSollund
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 128


« Reply #409 on: November 05, 2012, 01:24:50 PM »
ReplyReply

First thanks a lot for sharing your photos and other information about the DP2! Although I do not have a DP2 I am very interested in learning more of this camera, and this thread is impressive.

My very small contribution, and NB its not entirely positive  Wink Embarrassed : I finally got my hands on a DP2 in a not-so-local photo shop and was very surprised about the huge size. To be honest I was expecting something like the old FF Minox camera. Yeah, I know, DP2 delivers incredible IQ, but for me its not a compact. Here is a comparison with a M9, the M9 being just a tad larger:
http://camerasize.com/compare/#293,213

Sorry if I'm a partybreaker, but others than me might have unrealistic expectations  Cheesy
Logged

-------
- If your're not telling a story with photo you're only adding noise -
http://alfsollund.com/
mikechen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« Reply #410 on: November 05, 2012, 05:03:36 PM »
ReplyReply

...
 Here is a comparison with a M9, the M9 being just a tad larger:
http://camerasize.com/compare/#293,213
...
Here is a comparison with the Sony RX-1, which is a more comparable camera (single focal length, non-interchangeable lens, larger sensor):

http://camerasize.com/compare/#293,376

and the Fuji X100:

http://camerasize.com/compare/#293,133

But, that is a good question, though  the LCD would have to be smaller, and I assume that's a main part of the reason.

On a side note, is there an alternate to using the Sigma LH2-01 hood?  Would anyone recommend using something like the 49mm adapter tube and hood for the Leica X1 in place of the LH2-01 hood -- which is a bit hard to find.

Edit: Whoops, sorry! Looks like the DP2M doesn't need a tube like the X1 does, so any 49mm hood that covers 45mm-equivalent view should work.  I know some have recommended the B+W #900 rubber hood, but is there a significant difference between that model and other rubber collapsible hoods?
« Last Edit: November 06, 2012, 12:32:53 AM by mikecalif » Logged
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7781



WWW
« Reply #411 on: November 05, 2012, 06:04:16 PM »
ReplyReply

I finally got my hands on a DP2 in a not-so-local photo shop and was very surprised about the huge size. To be honest I was expecting something like the old FF Minox camera. Yeah, I know, DP2 delivers incredible IQ, but for me its not a compact.

You are correct, the DP2m cannot really be called a compact camera. It doesn't fit into a pocket easily and can also not be called discrete.

It really is a poor substitute to a camera like the Sony RX100, but it should not be considered one. They are just very different cameras, both of them offering best in class image quality when taking their form factor into account.

The bulk was in fact the main reason why I was not really attracted by the DP2m until recently. I believe that companies like Nikon, Sony or Canon with better engineering would have been able to make the DP2m significantly smaller everything else being equal.

But after using one for a few days, the size is OK when shooting. So it really is a matter of figuring out whether a camera this bulky can fit into your shooting patterns. I personally did find a way to make that happen.

Cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7781



WWW
« Reply #412 on: November 05, 2012, 06:05:58 PM »
ReplyReply

Point Lobos, CA



Very nice image, thanks for sharing.

The micro contrast in the rocks and water really help here as well as the low distortion of the lens on the horizon.

Cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7781



WWW
« Reply #413 on: November 06, 2012, 06:45:28 AM »
ReplyReply

Two more from today, the first one is a 28mp hand held pano stitch.





Cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Hulyss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 490



WWW
« Reply #414 on: November 06, 2012, 01:45:48 PM »
ReplyReply

Wow guys, I'm sure you got pleasure working those photos Smiley

Faust - The return.

Logged

Kind Regards - www.hulyssbowman.com
Foveonic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« Reply #415 on: November 06, 2012, 02:41:51 PM »
ReplyReply

Nice architectural shots..... Smiley
Logged
Hulyss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 490



WWW
« Reply #416 on: November 06, 2012, 03:14:58 PM »
ReplyReply

More conventional shoot now, the last ones was at High ISO and the last at 6400. Let's return to 100 Wink

Trees



Chrono's Shoe

Logged

Kind Regards - www.hulyssbowman.com
kmeyers
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 56


« Reply #417 on: November 06, 2012, 06:58:34 PM »
ReplyReply

Still new to this camera. Not in love with it yet, but getting there  Smiley

Logged
Foveonic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 39


« Reply #418 on: November 06, 2012, 08:30:39 PM »
ReplyReply

Very nice.....I love it.
Logged
macti
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #419 on: November 07, 2012, 02:11:38 AM »
ReplyReply

Kenneth: how did you achieve the toning? within SPP?
Logged
Pages: « 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 52 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad