Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 52 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Sigma DP2 Merrill Experiences  (Read 245593 times)
aduke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


« Reply #820 on: March 08, 2013, 05:26:50 PM »
ReplyReply

At the very bottom, of course! Smiley
Logged
mdijb
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 386


WWW
« Reply #821 on: March 09, 2013, 11:18:52 AM »
ReplyReply

How does one do HDR with the DP2 files?  None of the processors handle these raw files.  JUST do the merges on the 16 bit tiffs from SPP?? or is there another option?

MDIJB
Logged

mdiimaging.com
NancyP
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 817


« Reply #822 on: March 09, 2013, 12:04:14 PM »
ReplyReply

Yep, just convert to tiff , send to Lightroom or Photoshop or whatever and your favorite HDR plug-in . Works just fine.
Logged
uvl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33



WWW
« Reply #823 on: March 09, 2013, 01:45:18 PM »
ReplyReply

Juan,
banding in your pics might be a result of to much fill light combined with extensive curve bending in another program (Photoshop?).
I had a look at your pic of the beautiful pine tree at flickr. The colored version has no banding but the halos around the tree point to a fill light problem. Obviously the tree was to dark or the sky to light and you had to compensate for this. In such cases it's dangerous to use fill light alone. I almost always give the same amount of contrast when I use fill light. The picture looks  overexposed then and you need to compensate with the exposure slider. Over- and underexposure can be corrected with the highlights and shadows slider.

My rule of thumb is the following:  Contrast >= Fill Light = negative Exposure

Have you done the BW-conversion in SPP or in another program? SPP 5.5 is quite usable for that Wink

Uwe 8-)



Logged
Hulyss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 494



WWW
« Reply #824 on: March 09, 2013, 01:50:43 PM »
ReplyReply

The banding is a hardware problem. It can be soldering around the sensor, electrical leak between layers, a bad electromagnetic shielding (maybe it is why the battery is so small), it seems to appear on a batch of sensors who might have a little default or another component around the sensor ... and so on. Be sure we will never know what is the true cause of this Wink

If it was only firmware and software problem, this would have been sorted Looooonnnggg ago.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2013, 01:53:03 PM by Hulyss » Logged

Kind Regards - www.hulyssbowman.com
mezzoduomo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


« Reply #825 on: March 09, 2013, 03:06:44 PM »
ReplyReply


If it was only firmware and software problem, this would have been sorted Looooonnnggg ago.

Actually, it sounds like uvl just might have it sorted now....
Logged
uvl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33



WWW
« Reply #826 on: March 09, 2013, 04:47:28 PM »
ReplyReply

Yes Hulyss, partially. This is a hardware problem for almost all digital cameras. It has to be dealt with more or less. Usually camera software is able to sort this out. The price for this are other artefacts.
Juans pics show banding only in BW-conversions. Color pics are OK even with 1.0 fill light. Maybe it's just a little bug in his BW workflow.
Uwe ;-)
« Last Edit: March 09, 2013, 04:49:14 PM by uvl » Logged
juan_amores
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


« Reply #827 on: March 10, 2013, 05:19:56 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks guys. I see banding always in my B&W pics that I procesed with Silver Effex. I think that this is the problem.
Thanks!!
Logged
L-R
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5



« Reply #828 on: March 10, 2013, 07:08:35 PM »
ReplyReply

A relative novice here.  What I know about photography could be rolled around in a thimble, but I bought the DP2Merrill last week and want to dip my toe into landscape and architectural photography.  I just hope I'm not the fool for having chosen such a persnickity instrument through which to learn.  I think it will be a camera that I can grow into and whose output I can enjoy immensely if I take a deliberate approach, and that is my hope.
Logged
maxgruzen
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 125


WWW
« Reply #829 on: March 10, 2013, 11:30:30 PM »
ReplyReply

It would not be my choice for a first camera only because there is a higher risk of less keepers, and because I think it lends itself to a smaller range of options then a normal camera, BUT, it will be a fun challenging trip for you.
Logged
mezzoduomo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


« Reply #830 on: March 10, 2013, 11:42:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Sedona Arizona on a breathtakingly beautiful Sunday.
ISO 100, f6.3, 1/800.

Logged
Malina DZ
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10



WWW
« Reply #831 on: March 11, 2013, 07:35:32 AM »
ReplyReply

For the heck of skin tones (FW 1.04):



Unfortunately, Flickr applies additional sharpness  Angry
Logged
Rand47
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 554


« Reply #832 on: March 11, 2013, 07:58:47 PM »
ReplyReply

Terrible skin tones on the DP2M!!!   I'm horrified....     Grin

What a lovely model.  Beautiful photo.

Hulyss, you sure they didn't fix colors w/ the latest firmware?  This example is lovely.

Rand
Logged
The Ute
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 187


« Reply #833 on: March 11, 2013, 08:03:06 PM »
ReplyReply

Sedona Arizona on a breathtakingly beautiful Sunday.
ISO 100, f6.3, 1/800.



Thank goodness someone around here besides me posts Landscapes.

I was at Oak Creek Canyon last fall to hike and shoot.

Amazing place. Really, really beautiful.

Too bad I didn't have a Merrill at that time.

 Smiley
Logged
mezzoduomo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 186


« Reply #834 on: March 12, 2013, 07:26:00 AM »
ReplyReply


Anyone want to start an SPP Monochrome thread?



Logged
L-R
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5



« Reply #835 on: March 12, 2013, 08:27:32 PM »
ReplyReply

First time out with the DP2M.  I have no idea what I'm doing, but I'm having a good time.
Logged
stevew50
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4


« Reply #836 on: March 17, 2013, 02:46:38 AM »
ReplyReply

Here are some B&W.
Logged
stevew50
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4


« Reply #837 on: March 17, 2013, 02:50:21 AM »
ReplyReply

Another shot.
Logged
TMARK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1834


« Reply #838 on: March 18, 2013, 10:49:56 AM »
ReplyReply

Another shot.

These look alot like Mamiya 7 images shot of Delta 100.  Nice.
Logged
lainer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15


« Reply #839 on: March 18, 2013, 02:22:14 PM »
ReplyReply

What a gorgeous shot. Such detail!

Here is a link to a 9 image DP2M panorama of Cannes on the French Riviera.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/9806585/Cannes_Panorama_Printready.jpg

The printed image is 24 x 100 inches at 300ppi

All images handheld, manual settings, stitched in PTGui.  The level of detail in the printed original is quite incredible.

Quentin
Logged
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 52 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad