Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 [2]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Plagiarism?  (Read 11748 times)
kencameron
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 669



WWW
« Reply #20 on: September 26, 2012, 07:10:25 PM »
ReplyReply

...they have the right to restrict the (commercial) publication of images...

Ok. Makes sense. Nice shots, btw.
Logged

AlexanderB
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #21 on: November 12, 2012, 09:29:39 AM »
ReplyReply

It's not plagiarism, but this gets to the reason that I don't enjoy photographing art or architecture.  With this kind of photo work I am guaranteed to be piggy-backing on the artistic vision of someone else.  For this reason, I prefer the "found-art" feeling of landscape work or the challenge of capturing the uniqueness and individuality of a person's portrait.  If an artistic installation is done right, a photographer can't lose--amateur or pro.  That isn't challenging or rewarding work to me.

In this logic a painter depicting some architecture masterpiece is also piggy-backing. Art is and always was a blending of ideas and interpretation of things.
Logged
Pages: « 1 [2]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad