I've tried your profiles and they are very close to mine
Only 2 patches are different, 3 = blue sky is slightly lighter, and 9 = moderate red slightly darker than mine.
But in practical images, I see almost no differences.
Both profiles give more "saturated" colors than Adobe Standard.
Good, when similar cameras are close to be exactly the same is a good sign.
Some colors are "just" more saturated (or with different hue), but I definitely see great improvement in caucasian flesh tones.
Adobe standard is way too magenta while custom profile render natural skin color.
The only downside I found so far with my custom profiles is that, under very yellow lights (extremely low Kelvin) with problematic spectrum (not tungsten), some shadows on the skin become way too magenta. Only a tint adjustment towards green seems to resolve that.
Less saturated Adobe standard seems to be almost immune to this.