Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: theft  (Read 389 times)
Bruce Cox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 609



WWW
« on: November 05, 2012, 10:04:03 AM »
ReplyReply

It seemed to me they should meet and compromise.

Bruce
Logged
Kirk Gittings
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1533


WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2012, 10:09:21 AM »
ReplyReply

I don't get it.....
Logged

Thanks,
Kirk

Kirk Gittings
Architecture and Landscape Photography
WWW.GITTINGSPHOTO.COM

LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)
amolitor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 755


WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2012, 10:16:43 AM »
ReplyReply

Not sure I do either.. Bruce has pasted together one of mine with one from seamus? Perhaps he seems a thematic connection?
Logged

- Andrew

My awesome blog about photography: http://photothunk.blogspot.com
Bruce Cox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 609



WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2012, 10:52:14 AM »
ReplyReply

Not sure I do either.. Bruce has pasted together one of mine with one from seamus? Perhaps he seems a thematic connection?


It had something to do with keeping fetishes in context, but I regret it already.  Also, I thought an option for changing the processing in you picture was to make it more like the higher contrast in Mr. Finn's.

Bruce  
Logged
amolitor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 755


WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2012, 11:17:51 AM »
ReplyReply

Ah, thank you for the clarification Wink I promise I am not now, nor was I ever, offended.
Logged

- Andrew

My awesome blog about photography: http://photothunk.blogspot.com
Bruce Cox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 609



WWW
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2012, 12:01:02 PM »
ReplyReply

OK, if that doesn't offend you, here is a higher contrast version.  I feel I need the practice at this kind of thing.

Bruce
Logged
amolitor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 755


WWW
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2012, 12:02:48 PM »
ReplyReply

That is actually quite a bit like it came out of the camera. As you can see you wind up with trouble on the face of the woman on the right, and you lose stuff in the shadows (I don't mind the latter, I do mind the former).

Still, I get that it's the "look" you're going for here, not the details. Thanks for pointing in a direction, here, I will noodle on it.
Logged

- Andrew

My awesome blog about photography: http://photothunk.blogspot.com
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad