Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: The Barn  (Read 2029 times)
Larry Heath
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 154


« on: November 15, 2012, 03:53:57 PM »
ReplyReply

My son does something called hipotherapy once a week for his CP, keeps his muscles loose, so I have to stand around not doing much for thirty minutes. The barn intrigued me with the highly shellacked wood interior so I tried an HDR looking from one end out the other end of the barn into the bright sunlight. Not really sure whether I like it or not. I guess I am also kind of afraid of that over the top look some HDR stuff can have.


The Barn by Larry Heath, on Flickr

All comments and suggestions thankfully received.

Later Larry
Logged
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2013


Editing Allowed


« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2012, 09:43:57 PM »
ReplyReply

I'm not much of an HDR fan. I've given it a go a few times but only half-assed, quite unlike this shot. I find that I like this shot..it is perhaps a teeny tad overcooked, but not enough to dissuade me from having a longer than usual look and certainly appreciating the technique, composition and overall visual impact.
Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6838


« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2012, 02:28:46 AM »
ReplyReply

I like it but find that it is on the verge of overcooking… I would try to darken the interior a bit.
Logged

Francois
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2718


« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2012, 03:28:35 AM »
ReplyReply

The previous two posters said it all.
Logged

kencameron
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 669



WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2012, 04:17:41 AM »
ReplyReply

For me color is about emotion, among other things, and I am not sure what emotion you are after with the colors on this one, as they struck me as verging on being ugly. I thought the shot might work better in B&W, so I had a go. If you are unhappy with my version being posted, let me know and I will delete it at once.
Logged

sierraman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 157



« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2012, 09:06:45 AM »
ReplyReply

I like it. Seems a little out of focus on the (r) edge of the image.   Smiley
Logged
dmerger
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686


« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2012, 10:38:28 AM »
ReplyReply

To me, the outside part seems a little too dark to look realistic.  If it was my photo, I'd try to lighten that area a little.
Logged

Dean Erger
Larry Heath
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 154


« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2012, 08:15:40 PM »
ReplyReply

Although I like to think I have a reasonable color managed work flow I must admit that sometimes I get color surprises, usually not large ones but some none the less. I have been playing around with some new materials, to me anyway, Breathing Color’s photo glossy and metallic papers, using there ICC’s as a start. Anyway I was over where I keep one of my printers printing some school/sports packages and on a whim decided to print this file on the Breathing Color gloss material using their profile and got a bit of a happy accident. For whatever reasons it seems to have given me by chance most of the suggestions voiced here.  The interior printed just a slight touch darker and warmer and the exterior a tiny bit lighter. As far as that goes it seems to have allayed my discomfort as to whether there is a blunt obviousness that the print is an HDR shot.

On the down side the print seems to have accentuated the significant differences in the color temperatures inside and outside to the point that it’s more noticeable than on my monitors.  I was fairly happy with the color inside given the florescent lighting as seen on the monitor but the print has a slightly heightened yellowish color cast in the concrete. As well the blue cast from the outside light on the far end has gotten a bit garish and will need to be dealt with as well. I suspect that if I build my own profile that interior color should be managed, I likely will need to knock down the blue at the far end by other means.

This is all well and good.

Then of course, much to my disbelief, using a bit less time and work you could just do it with one apparently useless NEF frame and using LR 4.2.


BarnOneFrame by Larry Heath, on Flickr

That started here.


StartOneFrameBarn by Larry Heath, on Flickr

Then ending here.


EndOneFrameBarn by Larry Heath, on Flickr

I really didn’t think it was possible to do this. Now there is a good bit more noise in the single frame, but all in all not too shabby.
Logged
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2013


Editing Allowed


« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2012, 09:06:42 PM »
ReplyReply

Well, I said you may have overcooked the original image a bit..but that was before I had a go at it...



Did manage to get a good background in the opening and it may be a bit "bright," but I kind of like this much pop.
Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
dmerger
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686


« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2012, 09:42:12 PM »
ReplyReply

Larry, your new version is a huge improvement!  It's amazing what LR can do with severely underexposed images.
Logged

Dean Erger
Larry Heath
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 154


« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2012, 10:06:00 PM »
ReplyReply

WHOA! That is a bit disturbing. Not the picture itself, but more so the momentary sensation of having a flashback from my college days, brought about by the various chemical enhancement experiments I occasionally performed on myself. I have to say that’s not only “pop”, but snap crackle bang and boom as well as a few others I can’t bring to mind at the moment!  Wink

Later Larry
Logged
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2013


Editing Allowed


« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2012, 10:58:57 PM »
ReplyReply

I was thinking psychedelic myself when I finished..I like your newer version but now I find it a bit on the flat side...maybe a marriage of the two somewhere.
Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
tom b
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 869


WWW
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2012, 12:24:44 AM »
ReplyReply



A desaturated version.

Cheers,
Logged

francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6838


« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2012, 03:28:22 AM »
ReplyReply

…A desaturated version.

Cheers,

I like this version a lot. It removes the saturation that seemed unnatural to me.
Logged

Francois
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2013


Editing Allowed


« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2012, 08:02:34 AM »
ReplyReply

Once I finished that last stick of ganga, I went back to "normal," and reworked my original insanity...gotta love flashbacks.  Grin

Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
langier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 639



WWW
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2012, 12:16:15 PM »
ReplyReply

Much nicer, more realistic.

For the "Ansel Adams" technique of HDR (N-2, N-3), the goal is to tame the contrast for the limited DR of the paper AND not have the garish look that screams "HDR", IMO.
Logged

Larry Angier
ASMP, NAPP, ACT, and many more!

Webmaster, RANGE magazine
Editor emeritus, NorCal Quarterly

web--http://www.angier-fox.photoshelter.com
facebook--larry.angier
twitter--#larryangier
google+LarryAngier
Peter McLennan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1692


« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2012, 08:05:27 PM »
ReplyReply

To me, the outside part seems a little too dark to look realistic...

I agree.  Even on the latest version.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad