Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Best sports lens  (Read 1407 times)
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1890


Editing Allowed


« on: November 28, 2012, 10:32:41 AM »
ReplyReply

for the Nikon D7000. I would like to continue to shoot events like rodeos, baseball or soccer games, racing, etc. I see there are two Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR lenses, and the AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR
 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED. Is there really enough of a difference in performance to justify paying nearly $700 more for the later version?

Or, is there a better lens comparably priced that will get me the performance the 70-200 2.8 seems to achieve?
Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1890


Editing Allowed


« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2012, 07:11:51 AM »
ReplyReply

Figured with the DX format, the earlier version would be just as good. I also went with a 1.7 teleconverter and a new monopod.
Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
qwz
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 82



WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2012, 01:02:40 PM »
ReplyReply

Try Sigma 2.8/120-300mm
Logged
jeremypayne
Guest
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2012, 02:28:36 PM »
ReplyReply

Figured with the DX format, the earlier version would be just as good. I also went with a 1.7 teleconverter and a new monopod.

Yes ... The I own the original.  On DX, it is a true star.  On FX, it is GREAT up to about 135mm ... From 135-200 it is useless as a landscape lens, but just fine for portaits and sports where the corners don't matter.

I have shot it on both my D700 and a D300s.  Even with it's shortcomings, it is my most used lens.

From 135-200 on FX, the corners aren't just soft ... they are smeared ... Especially at 200.

I also use it with the 1.7 ... Which fixes the corner issue, but softens it overall.  Once you get to f8 and above, you get really nice performance with the TC.
Logged
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1890


Editing Allowed


« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2012, 12:26:06 PM »
ReplyReply

I appreciate the suggestion but I have not had great results with the two Sigma lenses I've tried so they are not on my buy list.

Thanks Jeremy. Your endorsement has been shared by others in different places. I am much looking forward to working with this lens and converter.
Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
adelehmacca
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1



« Reply #5 on: December 13, 2012, 01:20:47 AM »
ReplyReply

Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 lens
Logged

Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1890


Editing Allowed


« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2012, 09:16:39 AM »
ReplyReply

I went with the 70-200 2.8 nikkor with 1.7 teleconverter and I love it...now if it would just stop raining so I could use the glass, I would be most happy.
Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad