Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Ice  (Read 1060 times)
RobbieV
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 261


Ice
« on: January 03, 2013, 03:31:14 PM »
ReplyReply






Logged
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4062



« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2013, 02:56:41 AM »
ReplyReply

The first is spoiled by the band of featureless snow. I like the second, with its little splash of gold.

Jeremy
Logged
William Walker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 554



WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2013, 03:01:40 AM »
ReplyReply

The first is spoiled by the band of featureless snow. I like the second, with its little splash of gold.

I agree with Jeremy.
Logged

PeterAit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1959



WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2013, 07:25:28 AM »
ReplyReply

I agree - snow/ice is not featureless white like a sheet of paper, it has texture. Both images, particularly the first one, are spoiled by areas of blank white. If you are using Lightroom, try the highlight recovery tool.
Logged

Peter
"Photographic technique is a means to an end, never the end itself."
View my photos at http://www.peteraitken.com
petermfiore
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 584



WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2013, 08:32:33 AM »
ReplyReply

I agree - snow/ice is not featureless white like a sheet of paper, it has texture. Both images, particularly the first one, are spoiled by areas of blank white. If you are using Lightroom, try the highlight recovery tool.


On my monitor I see detail in the white areas that you note.

Peter
Logged

RobbieV
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 261


« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2013, 09:35:16 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for the comments. I tried to keep the detail in the snow there, but not dominant, as the water and ice is the most interesting part of the photo to me with the white acting as a separator. I may come back to this and adjust for more detail, however the prints I've made do show detail.

Logged
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4062



« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2013, 01:26:56 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for the comments. I tried to keep the detail in the snow there, but not dominant, as the water and ice is the most interesting part of the photo to me with the white acting as a separator. I may come back to this and adjust for more detail, however the prints I've made do show detail.

You've seen the prints, of course, and I've not, but I think that even with some detail in the snow, #1 wouldn't work: the band of white is just too dominant. #2, of course, would be even better.

Jeremy
Logged
RobbieV
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 261


« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2013, 08:09:24 AM »
ReplyReply

This is very true Jeremy. I should say that the print isn't intended for sale, but rather for me to learn from. I have access to a 60" printer and am able to make prints every now and then. I use it mostly to put into practice what I've learned from this site and other readings. I am slowly building a personal portfolio though.

I think that this area is worth (another) re-shoot, as the more I look at these two photos, the more I think they are "merely pretty". At best.
Logged
amolitor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 803


WWW
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2013, 08:27:39 AM »
ReplyReply

The splash of gold in the first one I will "buy" as light, but not in the second one. It looks like some radioactive urine in the water or something. It looks like shabby selective coloring in the second one.

I quite like the first one, with the contrast of the golden light with the blue toned lower half. It's a pleasingly attractive semi-abstract and, to a degree, it feels cold. It happens that this is the second set of ice photography I have looked at today, and the other photo (in some other forum) didn't manage to capture "cold" nearly as well as this one does. So, well done!
Logged

- Andrew

My awesome blog about photography: http://photothunk.blogspot.com
NikoJorj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1063


WWW
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2013, 02:30:17 AM »
ReplyReply

The first is spoiled by the band of featureless snow.
I don't agree : for me, the almost-slick white makes for a very interesting contrast and balance of textures, and that is what makes the image work for me.

The second lacks a bit of something to my taste, maybe some color in the snow, or maybe it should concentrate more on the water textures.
Logged

Nicolas from Grenoble
A small gallery
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad