Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Poland Hotel  (Read 834 times)
cjogo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1466



« on: January 17, 2013, 03:57:08 PM »
ReplyReply

Kracow Awning Entrance...http://imageevent.com/estrump/fineart?p=38&n=1&m=16&c=3&l=0&w=4&s=0&z=3
« Last Edit: January 17, 2013, 05:27:49 PM by cjogo » Logged
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6060



WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2013, 06:41:24 PM »
ReplyReply

Some marvelous work in there Jogo. Bravo!
Logged

cjogo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1466



« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2013, 01:26:10 AM »
ReplyReply

thanks  .. this was my Hassy SWC .. shooting straight up to the canopy...
Logged
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6060



WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2013, 04:59:53 AM »
ReplyReply

I'm not talking about the first abstract. It's good, but the whole series is excellent.
Logged

opgr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1125


WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2013, 05:08:16 AM »
ReplyReply

Indeed, very nice set of images.

I wonder however whether the images are a bit overcompressed or something, because they are very uncomfortable to look at.
Logged

Regards,
Oscar Rysdyk
theimagingfactory
cjogo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1466



« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2013, 12:26:15 PM »
ReplyReply

Indeed, very nice set of images.

I wonder however whether the images are a bit overcompressed or something, because they are very uncomfortable to look at.

Not sure how compressed they are from the originals -- most images start at 50/100mbg each >  just upload them to my site and they compress to their system...
Logged
opgr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1125


WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2013, 12:53:39 PM »
ReplyReply

Not sure how compressed they are from the originals -- most images start at 50/100mbg each >  just upload them to my site and they compress to their system...

Okay, maybe you should try to sample down the images prior to upload. Attached is what I get to see on screen. Looks like ringing artifacts from very heavily compressed JPGs. Perhaps the system is trying to compress relatively large files to some kind of low limits?

Logged

Regards,
Oscar Rysdyk
theimagingfactory
cjogo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1466



« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2013, 01:20:01 PM »
ReplyReply

Okay, maybe you should try to sample down the images prior to upload. Attached is what I get to see on screen. Looks like ringing artifacts from very heavily compressed JPGs. Perhaps the system is trying to compress relatively large files to some kind of low limits?




Should I use a separate software or some app inside  CS 4 ?  Guess when I first started scanning > my final results was to prints only .. Internet was not as prolific.  I just upload a 50meg file to my site and they compress..
Logged
opgr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1125


WWW
« Reply #8 on: January 18, 2013, 01:31:54 PM »
ReplyReply

Should I use a separate software or some app inside  CS 4 ?  Guess when I first started scanning > my final results was to prints only .. Internet was not as prolific.  I just upload a 50meg file to my site and they compress..

CS4 itself will do just fine. Simply resize the image to a more manageable size, so it fits the average monitor. Maybe something within the rectangle 1280x720 these days. You don't want higher res files on internuts anyway. Then use the Save-for-Web feature in photoshop to save a high quality jpg.

Logged

Regards,
Oscar Rysdyk
theimagingfactory
cjogo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1466



« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2013, 04:53:35 PM »
ReplyReply

Will look ..... I remember something about "save to the web" many years ago ... is that in the IMAGE dropdown ?? My prints are almost all square   16x 16  300dpi
« Last Edit: January 19, 2013, 01:52:37 AM by cjogo » Logged
cjogo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1466



« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2013, 06:49:58 PM »
ReplyReply

CS4 itself will do just fine. Simply resize the image to a more manageable size, so it fits the average monitor. Maybe something within the rectangle 1280x720 these days. You don't want higher res files on internuts anyway. Then use the Save-for-Web feature in photoshop to save a high quality jpg.



Tried the SAVE FOR WEB ..... got a warning my files were too big & would take too long to load ??

Guess I have always scanned /editing for printing ..;not the Web :=}
Logged
cjogo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1466



« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2013, 10:17:53 PM »
ReplyReply

Okay, maybe you should try to sample down the images prior to upload. Attached is what I get to see on screen. Looks like ringing artifacts from very heavily compressed JPGs. Perhaps the system is trying to compress relatively large files to some kind of low limits?


I believe thats grain clumps -- that I did not clone off -- thought I got them all.   I know my Minolta PRO was very sharp --  My negs are fine for wet printing in the darkroom ~ never saw any of amount of  grain projected on a print as you get from hi rez scans.  If you had not so perfect water for washing > it sure tells in a scan ..  Grin
« Last Edit: January 21, 2013, 10:25:42 PM by cjogo » Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad