Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: 425 million Google users get stock images for free. Photographers get $12. Once.  (Read 2014 times)
inthesouthofireland
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


WWW
« on: January 18, 2013, 07:13:23 AM »
ReplyReply

http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2013/01/16/getty-hands-google-users-free-commercial-images-photographers-get-12/

Exploitation of stock photo contributors as such is nothing new, but it seems that Getty has now walked over it's contributors in a manner that is one step too far.
Contributors of iStockphoto are organising a mass deactivation of their images for February 2nd.
Logged
Sareesh Sudhakaran
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 547


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2013, 07:25:27 AM »
ReplyReply

Does their (the photographers') arrangement with Getty Images allow that?
Logged

Get the Free Comprehensive Guide to Rigging ANY Camera - one guide to rig them all - DSLRs to the Arri Alexa.
inthesouthofireland
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2013, 08:23:59 AM »
ReplyReply

No. There could be a class action suit brewing.
Logged
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2013, 11:43:16 AM »
ReplyReply

Well, you go into these dumb contracts with your eyes open.

All professionally taken images should have been pulled years ago, when this penny stock bullshit began. It's like all bullying situations: take it and you just get more of the same for your pains.

Rob C
Logged

inthesouthofireland
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2013, 01:41:35 PM »
ReplyReply

Hi Rob, I'm not affected. I'm not involved in microstock. I looked into it years ago and decided it wasn't worth the effort.
But I have been following the development in that field from the corner of my eyes.
This latest audacity from Getty might just mark the point where enough people may say "a bridge too far" and go elsewhere. Interesting times.
Logged
TOlson
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2013, 05:51:17 AM »
ReplyReply

People love to jump on this as a 'severs them right' microstock attack.  The truth however is, there is a ton of traditional RF stock in this deal as well.  John Lund has 17 for example, there is lots of images from Blend (trad agency), people who paid $50 to have their images in the Photographers Choice program on Getty had their images stuck in here.

There photographer got $12 and now the image is on Google Drive available to anyone for free.

Sean Locke made a nice overview about what is all going on here
http://seanlockephotography.com/2013/01/18/the-getty-google-drive-situation/

There is a massive thread on MSG about photographers planning to deactivate their portfolios on Feb. 2
http://www.microstockgroup.com/istockphoto-com/d-day-(deactivation-day)-on-istock-feb-2/
Logged
DennisWilliams
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 45


« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2013, 08:19:09 PM »
ReplyReply

No one put your nuts in a vise and said comply. Do not shoot without being paid first. It really is that simple. If you shoot on spec that is your choice and if you shoot digital that is as well. Supply and demand does not cease to exist at the faux darkroom door. If what the folks with real money want is not you that's tough. Evolve or settle for 12 bucks. 
Logged
Bullfrog
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 175


« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2013, 11:20:48 AM »
ReplyReply

Just when I thought the pond couldn't get any shallower.  That well has been drying up for years,  and its hard not to scream I TOLD YOU SO.  
While Getty's tactics are reprehensible, people are stupid and gullible and desparate. 


 

« Last Edit: February 16, 2013, 11:28:31 AM by Bullfrog » Logged
iluvmycam
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 311


WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2013, 01:44:58 PM »
ReplyReply

Too many photogs and a glut of images for free...that is our reality.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad