Bridge in fog

[marvpelkey]

Little bit of fog, little bit of sunrise, little bit of bridge.

Marv

[Tony Jay]

Nice abstract qualities.

Tony Jay

[kikashi]

Little bit of fog, little bit of sunrise, little bit of bridge.

Marv

It's good - but it's a shame about the street lamp.

Jeremy

[francois]

It's good - but it's a shame about the street lamp.

Jeremy

It wouldn't be hard to remove it from the photo. As it is, the lamp is probably in the best possible place.

[popnfresh]

The street lamp doesn't bother me. I like it just as it is.

[Slobodan Blagojevic]

It's good - but it's a shame about the street lamp.

Jeremy

+1

[RSL]

Unless the point of the picture is intended to be unidentified diagonals in fog I think the lamp is an important part of the picture. Without the lamp, the only reason to see this as a bridge is the title. But the lamp belongs closer to the right side of the picture -- about a third of the way in from the edge. Yes, I know, everybody will tell you that we shouldn't genuflect to the rule of thirds, and occasionally that's an attitude that fits the situation. But not this time.

[sdwilsonsct]

I'm anti-lamp on this one. I like the colours and composition.

[Josh-H]

There are strong graphical elements in this image and lovely light. In short there is a lot to like. I do think it would be stronger without the light pole though as its counterproductive to the strong ordered geometry.

Great capture.

[marvpelkey]

Thanks, all, for the comments. To my right was some very cold river water, to my left a thicket of brambles, so I was quite restricted in what I could do with the composition. Having said that, I kind of like the inclusion of the lamp.

Marv