Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Street photography & cameras.  (Read 22210 times)
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2700


« Reply #20 on: January 31, 2013, 03:50:55 AM »
ReplyReply

Isaac, when I give a partial quote that is WHAT I want you to see, not the whole quote. If I wanted you to see the whole quote then I would have given the whole quote.

Quote Isaac Reply # 19

Even given the reference "Reply # 11" we have to search to find your example.

Unquote.

Isaac I will give you a clue. The numbered posts are in numerical order, so I don't think they are too hard to find? Wink Grin
Logged

Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2811


« Reply #21 on: January 31, 2013, 09:44:15 AM »
ReplyReply

...when I give a partial quote that is WHAT I want you to see, not the whole quote.

Thus readers see the partial quote not the whole quote.
Logged
Petrus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 509


« Reply #22 on: January 31, 2013, 10:04:21 AM »
ReplyReply

Thus readers see the partial quote not the whole quote.

I have a habit of picking just the relevant part of the quote to my reply, I see no reason to copy the whole long post if there is just a small point to make. It is more polite to the readers. I also do not understand replies which quote sometimes include a long string of photographs also, which take an awful lot of space and use up bandwidth.
Logged
Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2811


« Reply #23 on: January 31, 2013, 10:43:19 AM »
ReplyReply

just the relevant part of the quote
It's really easy to cut out the irrelevant parts and show only the relevant parts using Quote.
Logged
AFairley
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1158



« Reply #24 on: January 31, 2013, 11:37:20 AM »
ReplyReply

A little topic drift is inevitable in any thread, but this is ridiculous.... Shocked
Logged

RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6251



WWW
« Reply #25 on: January 31, 2013, 01:07:00 PM »
ReplyReply

+1
Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #26 on: January 31, 2013, 02:36:56 PM »
ReplyReply

Well, you guys only need to post some street pix...

I'm sure the thread would revert to theme at once - even flourish with brand fanboy fervour! (Say that quickly and accurately with cornflakes in your mouth.)

;-)

Rob C
« Last Edit: January 31, 2013, 02:38:34 PM by Rob C » Logged

Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2811


« Reply #27 on: January 31, 2013, 06:27:17 PM »
ReplyReply

Well, you guys only need to post some street pix...

+1
Logged
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2700


« Reply #28 on: February 01, 2013, 03:12:12 AM »
ReplyReply

I have a habit of picking just the relevant part of the quote to my reply, I see no reason to copy the whole long post if there is just a small point to make. It is more polite to the readers. I also do not understand replies which quote sometimes include a long string of photographs also, which take an awful lot of space and use up bandwidth.
A little topic drift is inevitable in any thread, but this is ridiculous.... Shocked

+1 If Isaac persists then I have the option of deleting the thread. Undecided
Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #29 on: February 01, 2013, 04:30:53 AM »
ReplyReply

I'm taking my ball home.

;-)

Rob C
Logged

RedwoodGuy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 417


« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2013, 03:10:24 PM »
ReplyReply

I think the camera choice for any photography has to be one that will deliver the results the artist wants. And one which the artist is comfortable using in street situations. Leica's with a 35mm lens were used extensively by many of the best street photographers. But, no reason you can't use other cameras that work for you. I've used a Fuji 645, a Nikon FA, Mamiya 7, EOS 1V, and several others. No matter which I use, I try to have a lens that I can operate from inside the action zone. I want to be on the sidewalk, not 50 yards away. But others prefer the anonymous style of long lenses. To each his own vision.

Regardless of type of camera, you need to be able to operate it on instinct and very quickly. If you need to fumble with stuff like menus, or tiny buttons, you will have trouble getting dynamic shots. Time is measured in split seconds. Many people that used rangefinders would zone focus them for this reason.

I think long tele shots tend to look static and have too much compression. That's just my taste. I'm currently using the Fuji X Pro 1 for everything now, and that means street too. It's not the best I have used for street, but it is very workable. I do miss some shots with it because of focusing flubs, but not too many. It also has too many precious buttons that can be hit. On the plus side, the IQ is better than any camera I have ever owned.
Logged
ripgriffith
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 191


« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2013, 03:23:53 PM »
ReplyReply

For years I have shot political demonstrations - partly as a substitute for street - and because there are always a lot of police about then photographers can shoot away with little fear from members of the public.
Sadly, in today's political climate in America, you have as much to fear from the police as from the public.  Just ask anyone who has spent time photographing any of the "occupy" demonstrations and had their camera(s) confiscated by the police, perhaps returned later, but almost always missing the card or finding it "accidentally" formatted.
Logged
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6251



WWW
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2013, 03:29:06 PM »
ReplyReply

Sounds like a ready-made lawsuit. Any time a cop even touches your camera he's committed a crime -- unless you were photographing in a restricted military installation or other nationally designated sensitive area.
Logged

kencameron
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 669



WWW
« Reply #33 on: February 04, 2013, 03:51:16 PM »
ReplyReply

...I also do not understand replies which...take an awful lot of space and use up bandwidth...
I suspect you may have been around since the early days of the internet. I well remember being severely flamed by senior members of my "PC User Group" for quoting more than the absolute minimum in anything I replied to on the discussion board. These days, who cares about bandwidth - or even knows what it is.

On the substantive topic, I am one of those who would need a new attitude rather than a new camera before getting into street photography as defined by RSL and other aficionados. I like the idea of snooping from a long telephoto distance but can understand that it wouldn't be the same. The barrier is psychological, or even maybe moral, rather than technical.
Logged

WalterEG
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1155


« Reply #34 on: February 04, 2013, 03:53:43 PM »
ReplyReply

The barrier is psychological, or even maybe moral, rather than technical.

Penny for your thoughts Ken.

W
Logged
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #35 on: February 04, 2013, 04:36:59 PM »
ReplyReply

Pennies indeed! I have my own views on that too, as Walter well knows!

However, I think there are acceptable and non-acceptable ways of doing most things, street included. Where do the lines get drawn?

Rob C
Logged

kencameron
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 669



WWW
« Reply #36 on: February 04, 2013, 04:40:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Penny for your thoughts Ken.
Walter, I am talking about my own inhibitions rather than making any kind of judgement about what other people do. In photographing someone from relatively close up, and where they see I am doing it, it feels to me as if I am making some kind of approach to them, or even claim on them (psychological inhibition) or even intruding on their privacy (moral inhibition). The test of the moral inhibition is whether it would survive if I were out of sight with a long lens. A test which it fails. I also remain somewhat scarred after being  denounced as a pervert on a Sydney train for taking shots of fellow travelers with a cell phone.
Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2013, 02:45:18 AM »
ReplyReply

Walter, I am talking about my own inhibitions rather than making any kind of judgement about what other people do. In photographing someone from relatively close up, and where they see I am doing it, it feels to me as if I am making some kind of approach to them, or even claim on them (psychological inhibition) or even intruding on their privacy (moral inhibition). The test of the moral inhibition is whether it would survive if I were out of sight with a long lens. A test which it fails. I also remain somewhat scarred after being  denounced as a pervert on a Sydney train for taking shots of fellow travelers with a cell phone.



I think you have it about right.

I am often caught in other people's photographs because I live in a tourist resort and can hardly avoid it in summer; I used to find it difficult to go for a walk without stopping to allow some person to photograph his companion. I now no longer care, and simply go along my legal way. The funny thing is, they sometimes apologise to me for obstructing me. However, I find it annoying, especially if seated at a pavement café and know I'm in frame with someone else. Modesty stops me imagining I'm the main subject, but I could be mistaken. However, I always summon up a scowl smile. ;-)

Rob C

Logged

stamper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2700


« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2013, 03:30:15 AM »
ReplyReply

Sounds like a ready-made lawsuit. Any time a cop even touches your camera he's committed a crime -- unless you were photographing in a restricted military installation or other nationally designated sensitive area.

The restricted military installation scenario is legally the only barrier in the UK apart from trying to stop people to insist on taking their image that no photographer - unless a press photographer - would do. The Amateur Photographer - UK - stated if people don't want their photo taken in the street then don't leave the house. In the UK I have been shooting political events for about 10 years and no policeman has approached me about using my camera except for two who wanted to know if a particular event was to happen. They thought I was press. Police in the UK wouldn't want you delete images because if you had taken some that were wrong then it would be evidence?
Logged

kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3999



« Reply #39 on: February 05, 2013, 01:21:10 PM »
ReplyReply

Any time a cop even touches your camera he's committed a crime

Not over here, Russ. What crime would he have committed in the US?

Jeremy
Logged
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad