Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Another wetlands foto from S.E. LA.  (Read 605 times)
dumainew
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


« on: February 11, 2013, 10:25:23 AM »
ReplyReply

Comments, critiques, suggestions, and not-so-subtle parables truly welcome. Thanks
Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 4998



WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2013, 10:32:49 AM »
ReplyReply

Leveled well?
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
dumainew
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2013, 11:03:12 AM »
ReplyReply

Appreciate your commenting. But forgive my ignorance, not sure what you mean.
Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 4998



WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2013, 11:04:18 AM »
ReplyReply

The horizon appears to be tilted?
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
dumainew
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2013, 11:16:38 AM »
ReplyReply

It looks that way to me, too. If the waterline is made to look more level then the trees look crooked- and not in a good way. I corrected for lens distortion in CR, but it made little difference. I'm not sure what to try, but there definitely is something 'unsettling' about the foto. I've seen your work. Admired it. Any suggestions ? Thanks.
Logged
dumainew
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2013, 11:26:27 AM »
ReplyReply

Thank you for pointing that out. Here's a better version I think.
Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 4998



WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2013, 11:44:39 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for the kind words.

You see, I put question marks in both my comments, as I wasn't sure. As you said, there is something "unsettling" about the leveling, but I can't figure it out either. I tried my usual rule of thumb, ie, to connect the same point above the water with its shadow, but it did not show much change. Ultimately, it has to be your esthetic decision, not geometric one, how much to level it, or if at all. As for me, your second version looks more esthetically acceptable.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2013, 01:14:00 PM by Slobodan Blagojevic » Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
k bennett
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1410


WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2013, 12:41:34 PM »
ReplyReply

Yes, the first thing I noticed was the horizon. I understand that leveling it makes the trees lean even more to the left, but your second version looks much better anyway.

Logged

Equipment: a camera and some lenses.
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7443



WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2013, 01:12:09 PM »
ReplyReply

Yes, the first thing I noticed was the horizon. I understand that leveling it makes the trees lean even more to the left, but your second version looks much better anyway.


I like the second version, too. Most places I've been, trees tend to bend in the direction that prevailing winds push them. I've seen very few trees that actually stand straight up, so I can more easily accept the tilted trees in the second version than the 'apparently' tilted waterline in the first.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5560



WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2013, 01:22:22 AM »
ReplyReply

Well...? Personally I think the only real value in this shot is in the non-representational patterns in the tree trunks, so I'd go back and aim the camera higher, removing the water from the bottom.

Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad