Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 [2]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: World Press Photograph of 2013  (Read 1439 times)
Peter McLennan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1695


« Reply #20 on: February 16, 2013, 01:20:55 PM »
ReplyReply

These are difficult issues indeed, in The Golden Age of Photography.  : )

I agree with Slobodan that, if it's supposed to be journalism, then only the most basic of adjustments should be "allowed".
(but then who's doing "the allowing"  ?)

If, however the journalist's aim is to make a point, then surely he or she should be free to use whatever tools are available. Writers aren't so handcuffed.   Why should photographers be?

For us (and by "us", I refer to the highly photo-literate members here) excessive manipulation frequently detracts from the message. Certainly Iran's news organizations have suffered repeated ridicule from their inept photomanipoulations. But for the rest of the audience, photography's impact (and message, however distorted) frequently survives intact.  Is this fair?

I dunno.
Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6185


When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.


WWW
« Reply #21 on: February 16, 2013, 01:24:58 PM »
ReplyReply

... If, however the journalist's aim is to make a point, then surely he or she should be free to use whatever tools are available. Writers aren't so handcuffed.   Why should photographers be?...

That's why I made the distinction between "news reporting" and "editorial story-telling." In the latter, the latitude is bigger. As Eugene Smith would illustrate (pardon the pun).
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
Pages: « 1 [2]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad