Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: tree  (Read 379 times)
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3904



« on: February 24, 2013, 06:45:47 AM »
ReplyReply

Sycamore, I think, at Lyme Park in Cheshire. Comments welcome, as usual.

Jeremy
Logged
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1874


Editing Allowed


« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2013, 10:05:42 AM »
ReplyReply

Do you really need that much foreground to establish the tree is atop a hill? Try a narrower vertical with about 1/2 the bottom cut off.
Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
David Eckels
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 882


Paris sidewalk cafe


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2013, 12:53:27 PM »
ReplyReply

Do you really need that much foreground to establish the tree is atop a hill? Try a narrower vertical with about 1/2 the bottom cut off.
Even a "squarer" crop. The foreground is distracting to me, but I tried holding my hand up to block half the f/g and felt that would be stronger.
Logged

Bruce Cox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 660



WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2013, 09:48:04 AM »
ReplyReply

I like it in B&W.

Bruce
Logged
nemo295
Guest
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2013, 10:27:11 AM »
ReplyReply

I like it in B&W.

Bruce

Me too. I like the way the B&W version enhances the form of the tree and the rendering of the light is quite nice.
Logged
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6730


« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2013, 10:28:54 AM »
ReplyReply

I would also go B&W. With the color version, I'd either darken the foreground or remove some of it.
Logged

Francois
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3904



« Reply #6 on: February 26, 2013, 04:07:05 AM »
ReplyReply

One of the things that keeps drawing me back to this forum is the variety of views that people are able to take of the same scene.

Your opinions on this one are starkly different from mine, which is fascinating. I'd spent some time opening up the shadows on the foreground because I liked the way the light played on the tufts of grass; and I also liked the warmth of the sunlight on the trunk of the tree, which is why I'd not gone for a b&w rendering (normally one of the first things I try).

Thank you, all. Food for thought indeed.

Jeremy
Logged
Riaan van Wyk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 682



WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2013, 07:18:31 AM »
ReplyReply

I agree with you Jeremy, the foreground ( for me) adds some visual interest, it is not just a tree on a hill anymore, there is life all around highlighted by the sun.

Logged
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6052



WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2013, 07:36:33 AM »
ReplyReply

I've been coming back to it for two days now, trying to make up my mind. My first reaction was the same as Riaan's, and I'm back there again. It's a beautiful tree, but the foreground is an important part of the picture. I'll vote for the very first version.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7789



WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 26, 2013, 07:51:28 AM »
ReplyReply

I agree with you Jeremy, the foreground ( for me) adds some visual interest, it is not just a tree on a hill anymore, there is life all around highlighted by the sun.


Agreed. And the color version is just right for me.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad