Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 83 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Re: Recent Professional Works 2  (Read 290112 times)
ACH DIGITAL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 394



WWW
« Reply #380 on: May 22, 2013, 06:27:15 AM »
ReplyReply

Well done, Antonio! Each post is better than the last.

Regards,
Ed


Thank you Ed.!
Logged

Antonio Chagin
www.achdigital.com
Scott Hargis
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 194



WWW
« Reply #381 on: May 22, 2013, 10:56:03 AM »
ReplyReply

Great photo, Antonio.
Logged

<a href="http://www.scotthargisphoto.com">Website</a>
Craig Lamson
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 776



WWW
« Reply #382 on: May 22, 2013, 12:43:13 PM »
ReplyReply

Something a little different for me...

My client had to make changes to an existing chapel to facilitate a relocated (humongous) pipe organ.  The finished image is a composite of 15 exposures.  6 or so were for an HDR layer of the blown hilights.  The rafters were lit with a head on a rolling Hi Boy that moved 6 or 7 times.  The chairs were lit one side at a time and we had strobe bouncing in the Narthex to create depth and layers. They gave us a day to do the shot.  We did this one and a vignette in half a day.  Really fun assignment!



Nice job Chris.  Its fun shooting parts and pieces and making a frankenphoto in post.  Leads to some amazing and otherwise impossible images.

Can you imagine a single sheet of Ektachrome instead?  Smiley
Logged

Craig Lamson Photo
www.craiglamson.com
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #383 on: May 22, 2013, 02:15:28 PM »
ReplyReply

But that's cheating, Craig: this isn't really the implied single exposure either.

;-)

Rob C
Logged

ACH DIGITAL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 394



WWW
« Reply #384 on: May 22, 2013, 04:20:28 PM »
ReplyReply

Chris, It is a similar workflow and occasionally I'll apply it to my architecture as you did.  I shot a comparable room for a personal project I'm working on but it was quite a bit lighter so I didn't need additional lights.  I've attached the photograph, it's one of the few shots I made with my Arca RM3di(35mm Schneider).  I miss working with that camera but I couldn't justify it's cost when the majority of my architectural work needs to be done faster than it will allow.  I ended up trading it in for a 5Dmk3 and another 17 and 24mmT/S. 

By the way, a Cadillac project I worked on last March had a behind the scenes video produced (by Cadillac) of the shoot which then became the announcement for the car at the annual dealer show in Las Vegas.  Here's a link to my blog that has links to the videos. 

http://www.jameshaefner.com/news/

James, amazing colours.
ACH
Logged

Antonio Chagin
www.achdigital.com
HarperPhotos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1263



WWW
« Reply #385 on: May 22, 2013, 06:19:27 PM »
ReplyReply

Hello,

Keeping with the church theme.

Shot 3rd November 2005 with a Nikon D2x and a Tokina 12-24mm lens.

Corrected the perspective with Grasshopper ImageAline software.

A friend of mine was married in this church. After the service every one went across the road to the pub and they moved all the pews and set up tables, band, chocolate fountain and a mobile Barbeque and then had the reception. Very cool idea.

Cheers

Simon
« Last Edit: May 22, 2013, 07:57:12 PM by HarperPhotos » Logged

Simon Harper
Harper Photographics Ltd
http://www.harperphoto.com
http://www.facebook.com/harper.photographics

Auckland, New Zealand
Craig Lamson
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 776



WWW
« Reply #386 on: May 22, 2013, 08:00:12 PM »
ReplyReply

But that's cheating, Craig: this isn't really the implied single exposure either.

;-)

Rob C

Cheating?  Smiley It's just more tools Rob.

http://www.craiglamson.com/rvbuild.gif
Logged

Craig Lamson Photo
www.craiglamson.com
Fernando Marrero
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


WWW
« Reply #387 on: May 22, 2013, 10:18:51 PM »
ReplyReply


Don't know how I missed your post - anyway, better late than never.

Welcome to the scene, and I have to say, when I had my Rollei T it was well before it (or I) had the chance to do this sort of work!

Mine was usually fiull of TXP 120 - never really used anything else on 120 format other than FP3 a few times which didn't work on 120 (for me) but was great on 135... By the time T-max was out I had no more 120 cameras.

Nice tones in your shot - I never get skin like that with digital capture b/white conversions.

Rob C

Hey, thanks very much Rob!
Logged

Fernando Marrero
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


WWW
« Reply #388 on: May 22, 2013, 10:25:23 PM »
ReplyReply

Another one with the Rolley T and Ektar 100 (I think, I don't have here the negative but an old scan):
Logged

kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4122



« Reply #389 on: May 23, 2013, 02:45:34 AM »
ReplyReply

Thank you for this! very interesting.

My latest project:



I really don't like the lamps in the upper part of the picture, but this is how it is now.

Fascinating room, Adrian. Where is it?

Jeremy
Logged
jsch
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 433


« Reply #390 on: May 23, 2013, 02:53:16 AM »
ReplyReply

Cheating?  Smiley It's just more tools Rob.

http://www.craiglamson.com/rvbuild.gif

Hi Craig,

did you take that shot in your basement? ;-)

Best,
Johannes
Logged
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #391 on: May 23, 2013, 02:03:14 PM »
ReplyReply

Stretching the temporal parameters a little:

Kodachrome 64 and Nikon F or F2 for Hewden/Stuart Group plc calendar in Spain.

Rob C
Logged

Kirk Gittings
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553


WWW
« Reply #392 on: May 23, 2013, 02:13:30 PM »
ReplyReply

But that's cheating, Craig: this isn't really the implied single exposure either.

;-)

Rob C

No, IMHO it called problem solving and masterfully done too.
Logged

Thanks,
Kirk

Kirk Gittings
Architecture and Landscape Photography
WWW.GITTINGSPHOTO.COM

LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)
ACH DIGITAL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 394



WWW
« Reply #393 on: May 23, 2013, 02:18:39 PM »
ReplyReply

If you're feeling hungry, be my guest.

Logged

Antonio Chagin
www.achdigital.com
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #394 on: May 23, 2013, 02:25:30 PM »
ReplyReply

No, IMHO it called problem solving and masterfully done too.



Oh dear; it was meant with humour, implying that comparing a single sheet of film with the possibilities/difficulties of giving it multiple exposures in camera, la Sam Haskins, is possible, but that doing it with digital capture via many separate exposures is no more a valid claim for digital superiority over that single sheet of film because the digital exposures are, in effect, multiple sheets of film, not a single one.

Never mind, it doesn't matter, not even to Kodak.

Rob C
Logged

Kirk Gittings
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553


WWW
« Reply #395 on: May 23, 2013, 02:40:02 PM »
ReplyReply

That is what we used to do with film but there were many issues that are better with DC like registration and braceting exposure on each component without having to start the sequence over again with a new sheet of film. I still like film for many things but NOT a shoot like this. I apologize for misinterpreting your statement. It didn't sound like you actually.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2013, 02:43:13 PM by Kirk Gittings » Logged

Thanks,
Kirk

Kirk Gittings
Architecture and Landscape Photography
WWW.GITTINGSPHOTO.COM

LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)
Craig Lamson
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 776



WWW
« Reply #396 on: May 23, 2013, 03:37:33 PM »
ReplyReply

Hi Craig,

did you take that shot in your basement? ;-)

Best,
Johannes

Even worse...inside an RV Wink
Logged

Craig Lamson Photo
www.craiglamson.com
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #397 on: May 23, 2013, 04:33:02 PM »
ReplyReply

That is what we used to do with film but there were many issues that are better with DC like registration and braceting exposure on each component without having to start the sequence over again with a new sheet of film. I still like film for many things but NOT a shoot like this. I apologize for misinterpreting your statement. It didn't sound like you actually.


That's okay - just know I'd be terrified to be faced with that sort of work - always steered well clear of anything remotely difficult!

;-)

Rob C
Logged

Craig Lamson
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 776



WWW
« Reply #398 on: May 23, 2013, 04:58:52 PM »
ReplyReply

If you're feeling hungry, be my guest.



Nicely styled and shot.
Logged

Craig Lamson Photo
www.craiglamson.com
Kirk Gittings
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1553


WWW
« Reply #399 on: May 23, 2013, 05:50:03 PM »
ReplyReply

Ditto.
Logged

Thanks,
Kirk

Kirk Gittings
Architecture and Landscape Photography
WWW.GITTINGSPHOTO.COM

LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 [20] 21 22 ... 83 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad