Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1] 2 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Ascent  (Read 1944 times)
eosef
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« on: March 18, 2013, 12:39:37 PM »
ReplyReply

Saint Joseph's Oratory of Mount Royal
Logged
David Eckels
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 830


Paris sidewalk cafe


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2013, 06:32:59 PM »
ReplyReply

I like the image, but I am struggling with the "over" saturated blue of the sky. IMHO, I would want to tone that down, how far would be a matter of taste, but I thinks it's intensity takes away from the nicely lit building.
Logged

wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5582



WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2013, 01:43:09 AM »
ReplyReply

I like the image, but I am struggling with the "over" saturated blue of the sky. IMHO, I would want to tone that down, how far would be a matter of taste, but I thinks it's intensity takes away from the nicely lit building.

I agree.  I'd reduce the blue saturation overall, including the foreground, although you could keep it in the two windows if you want.

Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12215


« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2013, 04:25:57 AM »
ReplyReply

Pete Turner would never make it today.

Rob C
Logged

francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6461


« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2013, 05:03:30 AM »
ReplyReply

I think that this photo has been taken at night and this might explain the blue saturation of the sky.

I like it very much!
Logged

Francois
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5755



WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2013, 08:19:40 AM »
ReplyReply

Here's the solution to over saturation:
Logged

Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2352


« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2013, 11:48:14 AM »
ReplyReply

Pete Turner would never make it today.

My guess is that back then we'd have heard similar comments in the photography clubs :-)
Logged
Mjollnir
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 287


« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2013, 02:07:24 PM »
ReplyReply

I like the image, but I am struggling with the "over" saturated blue of the sky. IMHO, I would want to tone that down, how far would be a matter of taste, but I thinks it's intensity takes away from the nicely lit building.

Actually, that shade/intensity of blue is most likely from the lighting around the church.

I've shot the Korean/American Friendship Bell in Long Beach on NYE, lit up for the occasion by the same type of lights, and the skies are identical.
Logged
David Eckels
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 830


Paris sidewalk cafe


WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2013, 05:08:57 PM »
ReplyReply

I agree that we're talking esthetics and taste.
RSL-LOL. That did indeed take care of the saturation!
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7473



WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2013, 06:28:25 PM »
ReplyReply

I read Russ's comment as suggesting that all colors except black, gray, and white be "cropped out."  Grin
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5755



WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2013, 06:37:20 PM »
ReplyReply

Right, Eric. In this case that kind of "cropping" converts a standard tourist shot with over-saturated colors into a mysterious and gripping night scene.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5033



WWW
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2013, 08:29:26 PM »
ReplyReply

I think that this photo has been taken at night and this might explain the blue saturation of the sky...

My guess is it was the so-called blue hour, i.e., the time after dusk, but before the sky turns pitch black, and the sky then can turn very intensive blue. Not sure if this is the case here, or the saturation was jacked up a bit too much, but slight adjustments to hue (perhaps a tad more magenta?) and saturation might turn it into a rather convincing shot. Otherwise, a fine composition, and yes, Pete Turner colors.

Not sure about the highlights around the cross... where does that come from?
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6461


« Reply #12 on: March 20, 2013, 02:48:29 AM »
ReplyReply


Not sure about the highlights around the cross... where does that come from?

I've seen crosses illuminated by cross-shaped neon lights. It might be the case here.
Logged

Francois
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12215


« Reply #13 on: March 20, 2013, 06:07:12 AM »
ReplyReply

My guess is that back then we'd have heard similar comments in the photography clubs :-)


Plus ça change...

;-)

Rob C
Logged

Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2352


« Reply #14 on: March 20, 2013, 09:39:14 AM »
ReplyReply

a standard tourist shot with over-saturated colors

David Eckels made clear that his struggle with the "over" saturated blue of the sky was a matter of "esthetics and taste".

Is it that you don't like the color?
Is it that you don't believe the sky was that color?
Logged
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5755



WWW
« Reply #15 on: March 20, 2013, 10:11:29 AM »
ReplyReply

Actually, it's neither, Isaac. It's that the picture is much better in grayscale than in color regardless of struggles.
Logged

Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2352


« Reply #16 on: March 20, 2013, 10:23:39 AM »
ReplyReply

Mea culpa, when I read your words - "with over-saturated colors" - I mistakenly understood them to mean you thought the colors were over-saturated.
Logged
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5755



WWW
« Reply #17 on: March 20, 2013, 11:25:53 AM »
ReplyReply

I do think its over-saturated, but so what? Over-saturated,under-saturated or dead-on-saturated the picture's better in grayscale. That's a personal opinion of course and it's pretty obvious that opinions will vary.
Logged

Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2352


« Reply #18 on: March 20, 2013, 11:39:57 AM »
ReplyReply

So
  • you might think it's over-saturated because you don't like the color
  • you might think it's over-saturated because you don't believe the sky was that color
  • ...

and eosef will have more chance to learn something from your "critique" when you say what you mean.

Logged
RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5755



WWW
« Reply #19 on: March 20, 2013, 02:42:15 PM »
ReplyReply

What's your point, Isaac? Here are your "critiques" so far.

I'm sure eosef learned a great deal from these.

My guess is that back then we'd have heard similar comments in the photography clubs :-)

David Eckels made clear that his struggle with the "over" saturated blue of the sky was a matter of "esthetics and taste".

Is it that you don't like the color?
Is it that you don't believe the sky was that color?

Mea culpa, when I read your words - "with over-saturated colors" - I mistakenly understood them to mean you thought the colors were over-saturated.

So
  • you might think it's over-saturated because you don't like the color
  • you might think it's over-saturated because you don't believe the sky was that color
  • ...

and eosef will have more chance to learn something from your "critique" when you say what you mean.

If your intention somehow is to critique the photograph, it strikes me you're having a lot of trouble saying what you mean.

Logged

Pages: [1] 2 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad