Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Light in Shadow  (Read 761 times)
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2082


Editing Allowed


« on: March 23, 2013, 10:41:18 PM »
ReplyReply

Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5807



WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2013, 12:14:01 AM »
ReplyReply

I like it alot except for the moving branches shadow in the lower right.  However, unless you're willing to chop that off there's not much to be done with it.

Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2082


Editing Allowed


« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2013, 07:43:26 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks, Mike...that was the opinion of my spousal unit as well. Lots can be done with it, I just chose the aspect of Light in Shadow instead of this version, Light in Shade. We've had 15 out of 21 days of solid rain...I'm about to go stark raving crazy.



« Last Edit: March 24, 2013, 07:45:21 AM by Chris Calohan » Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
amolitor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 815


WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2013, 08:20:25 AM »
ReplyReply

It seems to me that the essential element is the single hanging frond/branch in the middle.

Have you considered a square crop, to isolate that against the gradient shadow/texture of the background? It appeals to ME when I crop it to just leave enough of the overhead branches to frame and reveal what's going on, and then down far enough to go square. It make is more abstract, but I think clarifies the idea? Well, it clarifies MY idea, to be precise.
Logged

- Andrew

My awesome blog about photography: http://photothunk.blogspot.com
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2082


Editing Allowed


« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2013, 10:02:27 AM »
ReplyReply

Show me, please.
Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
amolitor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 815


WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2013, 12:27:50 PM »
ReplyReply

I tried a couple of variant, and this is the one I liked best. It's interesting with the hanging moss centered vertically, but a little too graphical, it seemed to lose some of the essentials of.. I dunno, treeness or something.

With the blob lower is just felt out of balance.



Logged

- Andrew

My awesome blog about photography: http://photothunk.blogspot.com
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8214



WWW
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2013, 12:58:07 PM »
ReplyReply

Here's my suggestion. Not square, but a bit tighter on the top. I like having a lot of dark space below the hanging branch, and I like the vertical format.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Chris Calohan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2082


Editing Allowed


« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2013, 01:16:59 PM »
ReplyReply

I think I went somewhere between the two of you but I may lean more toward Eric's than mine.

Logged

What! Me Worry?

Life is about a little kid driving a Mini...
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8214



WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2013, 04:34:12 PM »
ReplyReply

I find that totally convincing.
Now just send me a good print of it. Nicely framed of course.   Cheesy
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6951


« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2013, 03:23:37 AM »
ReplyReply

I like this last version best. It's more "compact", the light branch is more important in the frame.
Logged

Francois
David Eckels
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1013


Paris sidewalk cafe


WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 26, 2013, 09:50:10 AM »
ReplyReply

I like this last version best. It's more "compact", the light branch is more important in the frame.
+1
Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #11 on: March 26, 2013, 02:02:55 PM »
ReplyReply

FWIW I prefer your first shot.

I think the fuller, taller shape is more pleasing, and the branch at the bottom right gives balance and weight to the base, which without the branch, just opens the shot up to indecision, as the various later, alternative crops prove. You could continue cropping ad infinitum if you remove that branch - which just means there's no strong, obvious concept left; you original take got the shot.

Rob C
Logged

michael ellis
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 79



« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2013, 04:13:46 PM »
ReplyReply

Hi Chris-

I like this one a lot. I also prefer the original take. While the crops all work, I really miss the shadow at the lower right. The crops seem to me to take something away which I find pleasing in this picture.

Michael
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad