Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Wild Lion  (Read 1580 times)
Heinz
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 70


« on: April 05, 2013, 10:57:46 AM »
ReplyReply

Does this work or not? Taken in the wild and lucky to get this shot.
Logged
nemo295
Guest
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2013, 11:49:49 AM »
ReplyReply

The lion himself is ok, but I don't care for the total lack of visual context and the crude masking around the lion only weakens the image further.
Logged
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4026



« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2013, 01:02:32 PM »
ReplyReply

Does this work or not? Taken in the wild and lucky to get this shot.

Not, I'd say. You certainly have a good shot of a lion, but I don't like the processing one little bit.

Jeremy
Logged
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2013, 01:03:39 PM »
ReplyReply

The lion himself is ok, but I don't care for the total lack of visual context and the crude masking around the lion only weakens the image further.


How dare you call Colorama crude! I always shoot cuddly toys like that.

;-)

Rob C
Logged

RSL
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6308



WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2013, 02:28:39 PM »
ReplyReply

I'm with Doug and Jeremy. Let's see the original -- before it got processed to death.
Logged

wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5744



WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2013, 03:42:32 PM »
ReplyReply

I'm with Doug and Jeremy. Let's see the original -- before it got processed to death.

Yes.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7997



WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2013, 05:13:52 PM »
ReplyReply

I'm with Doug and Jeremy. Let's see the original -- before it got processed to death.
Likewise.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Tony Jay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2132


« Reply #7 on: April 05, 2013, 05:28:52 PM »
ReplyReply

Heinz, keep working at this one - there is a great picture in this.

Tony Jay
Logged
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6843


« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2013, 05:09:48 AM »
ReplyReply

Likewise.


Agreed… When I saw the lion, I saw a good photo but after only a couple of seconds, the processing toned down my enthusiasm.
Logged

Francois
Heinz
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 70


« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2013, 03:27:59 PM »
ReplyReply

Hi Guy's,

Thanx for the feed back. I have posted the original for your info. Very little was done to this image, selected lasso tool, crudely outlined the Lion, selected inverse and in levels dragged the white slider towards the black slider untill the background was white. The reason for posting this image purely to find out if there is interest in this style of wildlife. The processing work is terrible I know  Grin
Logged
nemo295
Guest
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2013, 04:52:55 PM »
ReplyReply

Much much better.
Logged
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7997



WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2013, 05:39:05 PM »
ReplyReply

Fine portrait.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Tony Jay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2132


« Reply #12 on: April 10, 2013, 03:31:24 AM »
ReplyReply

That, is a nice puddy tat!

Tony Jay
Logged
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6843


« Reply #13 on: April 10, 2013, 05:34:58 AM »
ReplyReply

Fine portrait.


Yes, I agree. Now this a very nice photo!
Logged

Francois
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4026



« Reply #14 on: April 10, 2013, 01:20:05 PM »
ReplyReply

Fine shot. I'm not terribly keen on the crop, though: I think either tighter, for emphasis, or looser, for space, would be better.

Jeremy
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad