Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Adobe diverging Creative Cloud and Standard versions  (Read 81788 times)
Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2961


« Reply #700 on: May 16, 2013, 02:03:18 PM »
ReplyReply

Adobe's public faces tried to calm nerves when subscription software was first announced by assuring customers that Adobe was intent on providing a dual licensing strategy, and that what eventually became the CC model was only an option offered in the interest of serving certain customer's interests.

Please show me where "Adobe's public faces..." etc because I now know your comments are "not meant to be taken seriously".

Oct. 3, 2011 Adobe Unveils Creative Cloud
Logged
Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2961


« Reply #701 on: May 16, 2013, 02:09:23 PM »
ReplyReply

With the precedent that was set by Adobe last week ... it is neither speculation nor are we uninformed. The die has been cast. Regardless of any assurances that have been offered, Adobe has established they will do as they choose even if they indicated otherwise in the past.

You seem to feel that Adobe Systems Incorporated made you some kind of promise -- please show me where they made that promise.
Logged
john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2889



WWW
« Reply #702 on: May 16, 2013, 02:13:30 PM »
ReplyReply

You seem to feel that Adobe Systems Incorporated made you some kind of promise -- please show me where they made that promise.
There is an expectation that results from the relationship people have enjoyed with Adobe for many years. You're merely splitting hairs, as well as being irritating.
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6183


When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.


WWW
« Reply #703 on: May 16, 2013, 02:35:03 PM »
ReplyReply

You seem to feel that Adobe Systems Incorporated made you some kind of promise -- please show me where they made that promise.

Isaac,

You of all people, as the LuLa's Hairsplitter-in-Chief, should know that words have more than one meaning.

"Some kind of promise" is known as implicit promise.
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2961


« Reply #704 on: May 16, 2013, 02:38:14 PM »
ReplyReply

There is an expectation that results from the relationship people have enjoyed with Adobe for many years. You're merely splitting hairs, as well as being irritating.

The relationship has been that Adobe are free to offer or not-offer whatever products or services they think will work for them, and we're free to accept or decline what they offer.

Many have said that they regularly declined what Adobe offered.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2013, 02:42:02 PM by Isaac » Logged
Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2961


« Reply #705 on: May 16, 2013, 02:45:01 PM »
ReplyReply

"Some kind of promise" is known as implicit promise.

Please say what implicit promise you feel exists, and why you feel there is that implicit promise.
Logged
jrp
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 77


« Reply #706 on: May 16, 2013, 02:50:29 PM »
ReplyReply

It's going to be interesting to see how this all pans out over the next year or two.

Current non-business PS CS6 users (including the photographers that are a bit more into processing their work, just as the darkroom aficionados did in the old days) will doubtless stick with CS6, particularly outside the USA.

Current Lightroom users will carry on down that track.  PS Elements users may also continue out of habit, but even they, and Lightroom users who don't need the full Monty, may find the attractions of the new google auto processing service hard to resist, as will phone / tablet photomakers:
http://www.stuckincustoms.com/2013/05/15/why-the-new-google-server-farm-could-displace-adobe-lightroom/#disqus_thread

This is not great from Adobe's perspective, as the flow of new serious photographers who graduate to Adobe products from simple tools seems likely to slow.
Logged
john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2889



WWW
« Reply #707 on: May 16, 2013, 03:01:16 PM »
ReplyReply

The relationship has been that Adobe are free to offer or not-offer whatever products or services they think will work for them, and we're free to accept or decline what they offer.

Many have said that they regularly declined what Adobe offered.
Master of the bleedin' obvious, eh?

The relationship is not as limited as you pretend. In addition to the simple transaction, it includes other expectations, understandings, even emotions (not least those previously fostered by Adobe). It is perfectly reasonable that people express anger when Adobe changes the nature of the relationship, and it's asinine to pretend otherwise. Quit the trolling....
« Last Edit: May 16, 2013, 03:05:11 PM by johnbeardy » Logged

ButchM
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 188


« Reply #708 on: May 16, 2013, 03:13:26 PM »
ReplyReply

You seem to feel that Adobe Systems Incorporated made you some kind of promise -- please show me where they made that promise.

From your linked Adobe press release announcing CC in Oct. 2011.

"Pricing and Availability
Pricing details regarding Adobe Creative Cloud and its expanded capabilities around applications, services and community will be announced in November 2011. For more information, visit http://www.adobe.com/go/creativecloud. Adobe will continue to offer all its creative products as standalone offerings, including Adobe Creative Suite editions and flagship individual products such as Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign and Dreamweaver."

I'm not exactly sure where you came up with the term promise in reference to my comments ... but there was indeed the expectation that there would be a continuation of perpetual licensing options for future version releases of CS products ... Hence my references to my diminished level of trust in any statements they may make today, could be seriously considered as information that can stand the test of time in making future plans for anyone who uses their tools in a business environment.

I agree that Adobe is free to do as they wish ... I also agree each individual user has to come to their own conclusion as how to move forward ... I was merely pointing out that in the past, that decision was much easier to reach ... Unfortunately Adobe has chosen to make such decisions much more complicated than in the past ... If you can't grasp that concept ... not my problem.
Logged
Colorwave
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1004


WWW
« Reply #709 on: May 16, 2013, 03:15:08 PM »
ReplyReply

Please show me where "Adobe's public faces..." etc because I now know your comments are "not meant to be taken seriously".

Isaac, you are obviously trolling and just trying to argue for the sake of sport now.  We both know that my facetious remark was playing along with the "uninformed speculation" remark by associating the words of Adobe project managers with that description.  I don't really have the time or energy to play along with your game right now to Google for specific citations, but can assure you that there were both implied and explicit promises made about the fact that Creative Cloud offerings were to be a complement, not replacement for the traditional licensing model.  A quick look at John Nack's blog comments will show many commenters taking him to task for Adobe's reneging on his earlier reassurances.  I really don't think that you are interested in this sort of detail, though, because you have appointed yourself as a knee jerk defender of the CC New World Order.  I see CC's value, but also have grave reservations about it as a single track approach for Adobe's future.  Unlike you, I see shades of gray and not a polarized black/white, us/them scenario.  Unfortunately, nuance doesn't make for as entertaining of a debate for some, it seems.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2013, 03:18:16 PM by Colorwave » Logged

digitaldog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9223



WWW
« Reply #710 on: May 16, 2013, 03:18:32 PM »
ReplyReply

 I don't really have the time or energy to play along with your game right now to Google for specific citations, but can assure you that there were both implied and explicit promises made about the fact that Creative Cloud offerings were to be a complement, not replacement for the traditional licensing model.

In any of the EULA's we may or may not have read and agreed to, is that specified? Or in any other agreement between Adobe and end users?
Logged

Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/
Colorwave
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1004


WWW
« Reply #711 on: May 16, 2013, 03:20:32 PM »
ReplyReply

Legally, I'm sure not.  The lawyers always allow for wiggle room.  In every other respect, however, the opposite is true.
Logged

Mark D Segal
Contributor
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7050


WWW
« Reply #712 on: May 16, 2013, 03:27:28 PM »
ReplyReply

In any of the EULA's we may or may not have read and agreed to, is that specified? Or in any other agreement between Adobe and end users?

Andrew, typically, sea-changes in availability arrangements or pricing terms for FUTURE releases of software are not the kind of material covered in a current EULA corresponding with the current software. I haven't looked for any of this detail in my current EULA and I have no time to bother, but I would be mightily surprised, for example, to see anything in a CS6 EULA that would preclude Adobe from re-arranging how they handle CC beyond CS6. Any who has read the fine print, please feel free to correct me if I am mistaken.
Logged

Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6183


When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.


WWW
« Reply #713 on: May 16, 2013, 03:38:13 PM »
ReplyReply

Please say what implicit promise you feel exists, and why you feel there is that implicit promise.

You've got to be kidding me! And not just me, I guess.
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
Mark D Segal
Contributor
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7050


WWW
« Reply #714 on: May 16, 2013, 03:55:01 PM »
ReplyReply

Please say what implicit promise you feel exists, and why you feel there is that implicit promise.

Isaac, while I told myself I wasn't going to respond to this foolishness, I've changed my mind and I'll do so - just once: when a major corporation has been doing business with a huge clientele in a certain way for the past two decades, normal people would have a normal expectation of "basic" continuity for the fundamentals of the relationship and the business model; and the same normal people would be amenable to change if it were handled in a competent, non-threatening manner that provides adequate transitions and fall-backs. It doesn't depend on the fine print of legal agreements, it doesn't depend on the rights guaranteed in the constitution about how companies are allowed to do business, it is about the trust and confidence created over a long period of time, and then wrecked in one fell-swoop by an unexpected sea-change in some of the most important aspects of the business practices that a great many people have been nurtured to depend on. If you can't understand that, your problem.
Logged

Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml
Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2961


« Reply #715 on: May 16, 2013, 04:12:29 PM »
ReplyReply

Adobe will continue to offer all its creative products as standalone offerings, including Adobe Creative Suite editions and flagship individual products such as Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign and Dreamweaver."

Let's re-state the obvious - Adobe did continue to offer... blah blah - and do continue to offer... "While Adobe Creative Suite® 6 products will continue to be supported and available for purchase..."

The recent announcement was that -- "... the company has no plans for future releases of Creative Suite or other CS products".


I'm not exactly sure where you came up with the term promise in reference to my comments ...

As far as I know, there might have been some actual statement which you felt amounted to a promise.


... but there was indeed the expectation that there would be a continuation of perpetual licensing options for future version releases of CS products ...

When our expectations don't match what happens, it may well be that our expectations were no more than wishful thinking.
Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6183


When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.


WWW
« Reply #716 on: May 16, 2013, 04:31:29 PM »
ReplyReply

Keep calm and don't feed the trolls  Grin
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
Mark D Segal
Contributor
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7050


WWW
« Reply #717 on: May 16, 2013, 04:33:58 PM »
ReplyReply

Keep calm and don't feed the trolls  Grin

Yes, Slobodan, you got it - reach a certain age and life's too short to sweat the small stuff. :-)
Logged

Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml
Isaac
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2961


« Reply #718 on: May 16, 2013, 04:41:07 PM »
ReplyReply

When all you've got is name-calling...

How strange that the Troll is always someone else ;-)
Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6183


When everybody thinks the same... nobody thinks.


WWW
« Reply #719 on: May 16, 2013, 05:00:26 PM »
ReplyReply

When all you've got is name-calling...

How strange that the Troll is always someone else ;-)

Why did YOU specifically find it necessary to respond to my rather general statement, itself a variation of the famous WWII British motto "keep calm and carry on," is beyond me  Wink
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 [36] 37 38 39 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad