Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: The Adobe Creative Cloud Storm  (Read 28729 times)
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 8385



WWW
« Reply #100 on: May 21, 2013, 10:48:02 AM »
ReplyReply

I agree - "non-pros" are often professionals in their own field and shouldn't be demeaned.

John,

This is not what I meant. I meant pro users of Creative suite who do not belong to a corporation. In other words self-employed in the domain of graphic design and relying entirely on CS for their current work.

Cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Don Libby
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 729


Iron Creek Photography


WWW
« Reply #101 on: May 21, 2013, 11:11:36 AM »
ReplyReply

 Not feeling too good the past couple days has left me with little to do other than surf the web in search of answers.  I've read hundreds of posts which is slightly 55-45 (very unofficial on my part) against joining the cloud.  I did a very unofficial tabulation of those who were violently against what Adobe has done and those who have joined who seemed to offer rational reasons why they did it.

To be true no one like change.  I have a hard time at times accepting change.  However change can be in some cases a good thing.  In the end it's a very subjective thing that only the actual person making/accepting the change can offer.

I've been using Photoshop since about version 2 many many years ago.  I remember a friend of mine who had bought the program offering me a chance to try it free (okay it was a bootleg copy).   I remember I felt like a deer caught in the headlights.  Then shortly afterwards I fully embraced it and bought a copy for myself.  Chance can hurt at times.

Fast-forward a decade or two.  Last year I spent close to $500 to upgrade to CS6 and Pro Show Producer.  I had for several years thought of buying into the entire suite however the price was just too tight. 

Fast-forward to yesterday.  I logged onto my Adobe account and found that since I had a registered copy of CS6 I was eligible to join the Cloud at $19.99 per month (first 12-months) and enjoy the entire cloud.  (Just so that you know, Adobe is also offering this same price to any NAPP members).

So I joined.  The first thing I noticed is that I downloaded the latest upgrade directly to my computer for both CS6 and Premier Pro.  Other thing I noticed was a program that will save me countless steps (and one I was thinking about buying) Adobe Acrobat.  So last year I spent $473.00 in upgrades while this next year will cost me $261.72 ($19.99/mo plus $1.82/mo tax).  I realize and fully expect the next 12-months will increase, however I will also have 19-products to pick and choose from that will help me grow.

Choosing the Cloud was what I feel a good business decision as Adobe will never reverse their decision and I'm not going to cut off my nose to spite my face.  There's more to the decision and I just hit the highlights.

In short I feel it was the logical thing to do for me.

Don

I also don't worry about PSD files as all my files are either the original RAW or saved as Tiff.
Logged

kers
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 797


WWW
« Reply #102 on: May 21, 2013, 01:32:53 PM »
ReplyReply

"
So I joined.  The first thing I noticed is that I downloaded the latest upgrade directly to my computer for both CS6 and Premier Pro.  Other thing I noticed was a program that will save me countless steps (and one I was thinking about buying) Adobe Acrobat.  So last year I spent $473.00 in upgrades while this next year will cost me $261.72 ($19.99/mo plus $1.82/mo tax).  I realize and fully expect the next 12-months will increase, however I will also have 19-products to pick and choose from that will help me grow.
....
I also don't worry about PSD files as all my files are either the original RAW or saved as Tiff.

So you are not dependent on Photoshop since you save everything as Raw or tiff.. But if you are dependent ..? the next year may cost you 360 $ (?) ; Adobe now has clearly shown you do not know what will come next...
One of the problems with photoshop is that it is so (!) dominating there is no alternative.. If the company that makes it decides to change the price policy a lot of people are affected and become restless...
Logged

Pieter Kers
www.beeld.nu
Rhossydd
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2000


WWW
« Reply #103 on: May 21, 2013, 02:08:57 PM »
ReplyReply

Reprocessing 40-50 years work in a month
You've got 50 years worth of digital files ? that's a good trick.

My point is that failing to sign up for an on-going subscription doesn't (yet?) completely withdraw future access to the program or the files it's created in the past.

Maybe you'll change your workflow to another product for the future and will just need to save some files now to a new format, but you'll still be able to convert to newer format at a future date.

There's a part of the hysteria about this change to CC that doesn't merit close examination. Digital photography is quite possible without using Adobe products.

Logged
fredjeang2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 792



« Reply #104 on: May 21, 2013, 05:15:01 PM »
ReplyReply

Digital photography is quite possible without using Adobe products.

Yes, fortunatly, although not really an option for people who work in advertising or fashion. If I've seen almost all types of raw workflows, the PS stage for retouching is really the unique standart.
No retoucher that I know would use a GIMP app. In other areas, the need for PS is less important.

But I've been starting to use Nuke for stills some time ago and the app is really good, although not conceived for this task I see a potential. I haven't had the time to dig deeper into what can be done in Nuke for
still imagery, but I've been able to work on tiffs from Hasselblad Raw files on this compo app. But that means changing the layer mentality for nodes, and sometimes it's tricky.



Logged
jjj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3645



WWW
« Reply #105 on: May 21, 2013, 07:31:57 PM »
ReplyReply

You've got 50 years worth of digital files ? that's a good trick.
I'm not quite ready for retirement yet. I've been using PS for 18 years already, so I have a few digital files that started on film and a lot more waiting to be scanned as well as all the digital stuff since 2002/3

Quote
My point is that failing to sign up for an on-going subscription doesn't (yet?) completely withdraw future access to the program or the files it's created in the past.
But it will once your current CS6 software stops working on the computers and OSs that will replace one's current set up.

Quote
There's a part of the hysteria about this change to CC that doesn't merit close examination. Digital photography is quite possible without using Adobe products.
But there's nothing on the market to that comes close to PS, particularly when combined with LR.
Logged

Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography
Rhossydd
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2000


WWW
« Reply #106 on: May 22, 2013, 02:54:50 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
My point is that failing to sign up for an on-going subscription doesn't (yet?) completely withdraw future access to the program or the files it's created in the past.
But it will once your current CS6 software stops working on the computers and OSs that will replace one's current set up.
This makes the assumption you won't upgrade to an OS that CC will work on.
For me, will CS4 still run on Windows 9 ? (possibly), but, if not, I can have a month's worth of CC to reformat any files I haven't already converted to a more universal format that I still want access to.
Quote
But there's nothing on the market to that comes close to PS, particularly when combined with LR.
Much depends on what you need to do. There's not much, if anything, you can't do without the unique features of Photoshop in normal photography.
Care to give any examples ?
Logged
dreed
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1291


« Reply #107 on: May 22, 2013, 05:17:19 AM »
ReplyReply

No retoucher that I know would use a GIMP app. In other areas, the need for PS is less important.

What holds them back?
Are there specific features that are missing?
Or is it just a usability thing?
Logged
Rhossydd
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2000


WWW
« Reply #108 on: May 22, 2013, 05:29:52 AM »
ReplyReply

What holds them back?
Habit.
If you have PS available you'll use it if that's what you've been using in the past.
Logged
fredjeang2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 792



« Reply #109 on: May 22, 2013, 07:08:25 PM »
ReplyReply

What holds them back?
Are there specific features that are missing?
Or is it just a usability thing?

You have to keep in mind that retouchers are generaly working for many photographers until they find a powerhouse to stay-in. They need to be really good at one software that they know it will be a standart whatever Windows or Mac will be used. They were generaly trained in schools where the software has been PS since the early days of digital imagery.
The good trainings are given on PS. With PS they can't be wrong, so they don't even bother learning another soft because on a job interview they will have to PS.

I see a similar situation in the motion industry. Here, if one really want to join a high-level training structure, it's falling into: Avid for cuttin, Smoke for power app, and Nuke for FX. You train on those, there are jobs almost guaranteed if you're not bad, and generally the reputated structures and teachers are there. There is not really a hig-end training on a Premiere Pro or Vegas. Go to the national teevee training and it smells Avid from all pores. FX cine is Nuke and Maya. There is almost nothing on Blender, and Blender is good (what the Gimp is to PS), but Etc...

It's all about what a specific industry considers as a standart, and the schools use the softwares the industry asks for.

People would be amazed to know how many printing houses are still working on FreeHand despite it's no longuer existing for awhile. Of course they know ilustrator or in-design, but as Free-Hand was a standart, and a well appreciate one, there is absolutly no prob you send free-hand files, even today. I do it all the time, and that's why I kept a XP machine because Free-Hand is not suitable on windows 7.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2013, 07:23:40 PM by fredjeang2 » Logged
JohnHeerema
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 189


WWW
« Reply #110 on: May 22, 2013, 11:35:46 PM »
ReplyReply

Adobe could have offered existing CS product owners a subscription option that reverted to a perpetual license whenever the subscription lapsed. That would have offered the people who have already bought CS an incentive to upgrade a month at a time, instead of once every 18 months or so.

Had Adobe done that, the current flood of criticism wouldn't have happened.

I do not believe for an instant that Adobe didn't consider this option. The fact that they chose not to pursue it, shows two things:
a) Adobe does not believe that they can continue to offer product upgrades that will entice their customer base to upgrade regularly.
b) Adobe doesn't really care about people who have given them money in the past. They are looking for money in the future, and are fully willing to annoy all those people who have paid potentially thousands of dollars to purchase CS licenses in the past.

As has been pointed out elsewhere, Adobe expects to take a revenue hit over the next couple of years (see byThom.com), but believes that locking their customers into perpetual subscription costs is eventually going to be worth the negative publicity.

There has been a lot of talk about how fast things change in the computer world. That's been true in the past, but the rate of change has slowed dramatically in the world of computer hardware and software. Processor speed improvements are smaller and smaller. Operating systems and application software are changing more slowly as they mature. Thanks to virtualization, older operating systems can be run inside their newer offspring.

Most Adobe products today are awfully similar to what they looked like half a dozen years ago. Adobe must be looking at the next ten years, and realize that they don't have low-hanging fruit that will let them produce attractive updates at a pace that will sustain the revenue stream that they have grown accustomed to.

Anyone who owns a perpetual license is in a good position, and CC doesn't have a lot to offer us.

I've got a CS6 Master Collection. The only future upgrades that I expect to care about are upgrades to Photoshop, and I'd rather do without them than have files that I can't work on without paying a monthly ransom.


Logged
jjj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3645



WWW
« Reply #111 on: May 23, 2013, 07:52:38 AM »
ReplyReply

This makes the assumption you won't upgrade to an OS that CC will work on.
Not sure what you mean by this. Have you mistyped something?

Quote
But there's nothing on the market to that comes close to PS, particularly when combined with LR.
There's not much, if anything, you can't do without the unique features of Photoshop in normal photography.
Care to give any examples ?
Not sure what 'normal photography' is but like most software, the initial versions can do most of what the later versions can do as can their rivals e.g. say Avid Vs Vegas Vs FCP Vs Premiere in video editing. What changes and what is critically important is the speed/ease at which you do things and the improvements in ergonomics that make using later programmes much better than earlier versions. FCP7 to the initial release of FCP X being a notable exception as unusually it dropped essential features, most since reinstated.
And although I said above there is nothing to rival the combination of LR + PS. I cannot think of anything one thing off hand that is actually unique to other than the pure ease and speed of being able to work with them. But there is nothing with all the features in PS/LR/Br and that is the important part.
Logged

Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography
jjj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3645



WWW
« Reply #112 on: May 23, 2013, 08:00:50 AM »
ReplyReply

Most Adobe products today are awfully similar to what they looked like half a dozen years ago.
Do you expect the interfaces to constantly change to show they are better?
I really do not agree with this as I wouldn't want to go back to ten year old software. No way.

Though I do agree that the market is maturing and traditional revenue from must have upgrades will diminish. This has been obvious for a long time and I have wondered for many years as to when subscriptions would appear.
Logged

Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography
fredjeang2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 792



« Reply #113 on: May 23, 2013, 12:20:13 PM »
ReplyReply

Avid, PP, Edius, Lightworks, Fcp7...all
Competitors, capable apps. Some sectors
Would be more inclined to One or the other,
But more or less the same grocery.
There is nothing equivalent to what adobe has
In still imagery. Gimp is the closest but not really
At the same level.
Now, not everybody really needs the full features
Of PS. In fact only few sectors.
Logged
jeremyrh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 291


« Reply #114 on: May 24, 2013, 04:51:28 AM »
ReplyReply

Avid, PP, Edius, Lightworks, Fcp7...all
Competitors, capable apps. Some sectors
Would be more inclined to One or the other,
But more or less the same grocery.
There is nothing equivalent to what adobe has
In still imagery. Gimp is the closest but not really
At the same level.
Now, not everybody really needs the full features
Of PS. In fact only few sectors.
Bit long for a haiku.
Logged
fredjeang2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 792



« Reply #115 on: May 24, 2013, 07:48:15 AM »
ReplyReply

Bit long for a haiku.

Aint nothing
In still similar to
What ps is

Logged
jeremyrh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 291


« Reply #116 on: May 24, 2013, 07:55:50 AM »
ReplyReply

Aint nothing
In still similar to
What ps is


Creative Cloud --
Drifts across the sky
Far from photographer's reach.
Logged
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8286



WWW
« Reply #117 on: May 24, 2013, 09:35:39 AM »
ReplyReply

Creative Cloud --
Drifts across the sky
Far from photographer's reach.
Best one yet!
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
John Camp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1260


« Reply #118 on: May 24, 2013, 04:17:26 PM »
ReplyReply

Adobe statement
Hovers on the summer air
Like the sh*t of bull

(5-7-5)
« Last Edit: May 24, 2013, 04:20:38 PM by John Camp » Logged
stevesanacore
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 218


« Reply #119 on: June 02, 2013, 06:31:27 AM »
ReplyReply

After getting a better feel for everyone using PS and not wanting to go the subscription route maybe Adobe should consider also keeping PS as a product just like LR. For people like me who benefit from having Premier, AE, etc.. the subscription is worth it, but for others who only need PS and LR, it seems to be a different story. I see no reason why they can't offer PS as a purchasable product along with LR. If they don't I believe this opens a window of opportunity for Apple or other companies to compete with Adobe in a high end photo retouching app.

However I don't understand why anyone feels their images will be held hostage. Everything I shoot is in Canon, Nikon or Phase One format, not Adobe.
Logged

We don't know what we don't know.
Pages: « 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad