Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Hiding behind pseudonyms  (Read 9498 times)
john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2791



WWW
« on: May 11, 2013, 01:55:00 AM »
ReplyReply

Isn't it time to stop anonymous posting? Don't people think it would improve the tone of conversation?

I'd have no problem with a general rule that allows individuals to make a case for exemption (eg they're senior guys in Adobe's Camera Raw team) but I'd begin by barring new members from posting until their profile identifies them and makes them a little more responsible for what they say.

Anyone agree?

John
Logged

Tony Jay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2117


« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2013, 04:06:02 AM »
ReplyReply

I agree with the sentiment however I am not sure how one would enforce this.

Tony Jay
Logged
KLaban
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1671



WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2013, 04:23:39 AM »
ReplyReply

Agreed, I'm all for real names and accountability.
Logged

Chairman Bill
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1521


« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2013, 06:54:19 AM »
ReplyReply

Could you point to any irresponsibility in anything I've posted to date?
Logged
dreed
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1243


« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2013, 07:10:14 AM »
ReplyReply

Isn't it time to stop anonymous posting? Don't people think it would improve the tone of conversation?

I'd have no problem with a general rule that allows individuals to make a case for exemption (eg they're senior guys in Adobe's Camera Raw team) but I'd begin by barring new members from posting until their profile identifies them and makes them a little more responsible for what they say.

Anyone agree?

John

And what would that do for people like "madmanchan"?
Logged
John Cothron
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 170



WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 11, 2013, 07:12:39 AM »
ReplyReply

works for me
Logged

jeremyrh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 243


« Reply #6 on: May 11, 2013, 07:28:42 AM »
ReplyReply

What happens when someone doesn't agree with what you posted and tries to cause you problems in your "real life"? Has happened to me (not here) - there are some very nasty people out there, unfortunately.
Logged
svein
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 81


« Reply #7 on: May 11, 2013, 07:43:44 AM »
ReplyReply

I believe that using real names would reduce trolling, outrageous statements and offensive language to some degree. However, I don't think making rules that can't be enforced is a good idea, and I can't see how such a rule could be enforced.
Logged
kencameron
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 669



WWW
« Reply #8 on: May 11, 2013, 07:54:18 AM »
ReplyReply

And what would that do for people like "madmanchan"?
No impact on him, surely, as  he is a "senior guy in adobe's camera raw team" who has frequently disclosed his real name and whose posts set an impeccable standard of civility and relevance. And surely no suggestion that the great majority of people posting under pseudonyms aren't as civil as the rest of us. The idea is appealing but I share the reservations about whether it could be enforced.
Logged

john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2791



WWW
« Reply #9 on: May 11, 2013, 08:10:28 AM »
ReplyReply

Could you point to any irresponsibility in anything I've posted to date?
You, not that I've noticed, but others certainly.

And what would that do for people like "madmanchan"?
See his signature. I referred to him because I'm a little surprised and pleased that he seems happy to participate in plain sight.

What happens when someone doesn't agree with what you posted and tries to cause you problems in your "real life"? Has happened to me (not here) - there are some very nasty people out there, unfortunately.
Surely knowing their identity gives you more remedies than when you don't?

I believe that using real names would reduce trolling, outrageous statements and offensive language to some degree. However, I don't think making rules that can't be enforced is a good idea, and I can't see how such a rule could be enforced.
Other forums do enforce it, but I agree it has to be practical. Here, I'd start by making it very obvious in the registration that anonymity simply isn't allowed. Existing users - if there's one complaint against you and you've no ID, bang, you're gone for a week. Not sure about malicious complaints, but you can't make the perfect the enemy of doing what you can do.

When even someone as apparently thick-skinned as Schewe considers complaining about ad hominem stuff....

John
Logged

jeremyrh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 243


« Reply #10 on: May 11, 2013, 08:56:40 AM »
ReplyReply

Surely knowing their identity gives you more remedies than when you don't?

Maybe, but a post facto remedy is not much comfort when the rumours and innuendos are in the wild already.
Logged
john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2791



WWW
« Reply #11 on: May 11, 2013, 09:08:27 AM »
ReplyReply

Sure, but if someone knows they're visible they're less likely to become a bunny boiler?
Logged

PeterAit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1909



WWW
« Reply #12 on: May 11, 2013, 01:00:13 PM »
ReplyReply

Sure, but if someone knows they're visible they're less likely to become a bunny boiler?

Bunny boiler?!?! You've got to love the English language. Anyway, they are better roasted <g>.
Logged

Peter
"Photographic technique is a means to an end, never the end itself."
View my photos at http://www.peteraitken.com
john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2791



WWW
« Reply #13 on: May 11, 2013, 01:04:34 PM »
ReplyReply

It's from Fatal Attraction, Peter.
Logged

theguywitha645d
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 970


« Reply #14 on: May 11, 2013, 01:10:55 PM »
ReplyReply

And how are you actually going to do this?

-- Albert Einstein
Logged
Chairman Bill
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1521


« Reply #15 on: May 11, 2013, 01:23:32 PM »
ReplyReply

When even someone as apparently thick-skinned as Schewe considers complaining about ad hominem stuff....

Then how about a rule that forbids ad hominem comments? That you could police quite effectively
Logged
Chairman Bill
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1521


« Reply #16 on: May 11, 2013, 01:25:55 PM »
ReplyReply

And how are you actually going to do this?

-- Albert Einstein

Quite. My real name is Henryk Rumpelstiltskin Trotsky. Or maybe Frederico Gonzales. Or Marjorie Smyth-Hampton. Or ...
Logged
john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2791



WWW
« Reply #17 on: May 11, 2013, 01:28:27 PM »
ReplyReply

On another forum which I used to moderate we'd give you one chance. The moment there's a complaint, if your ID looks fake you're toast. It's not rocket science.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2013, 01:33:05 PM by johnbeardy » Logged

john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2791



WWW
« Reply #18 on: May 11, 2013, 01:34:38 PM »
ReplyReply

Then how about a rule that forbids ad hominem comments? That you could police quite effectively
That's effectively here already. I've always found that stripping away anonymity reduces that kind of behaviour.
Logged

theguywitha645d
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 970


« Reply #19 on: May 11, 2013, 01:35:01 PM »
ReplyReply

On another forum which I used to moderate we'd give you one chance. The moment there's a complaint, if your ID looks fake you're toast. It's not rocket science.

WOW. I guess we just need to tolerate your intolerance.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad