Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1] 2 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Ctein on PSD's  (Read 3114 times)
rasterdogs
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 84


« on: May 30, 2013, 09:38:58 AM »
ReplyReply

Given the Adobe CS in the cloud developments this is timely.
From The Online Photographer blog.
Logged
Mark D Segal
Contributor
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6767


WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2013, 09:44:31 AM »
ReplyReply

The URL underlying your hot link seems to be missing a "t" right at the front of the string, which prevents it from working. At least did so on my computer. You may wish to verify.
Logged

Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml
fike
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1372


Hiker Photographer


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2013, 10:02:30 AM »
ReplyReply

One of the obvious methods of archivally future-proofing your collection is to print your work on archivally stable media and put it in an organized and carefully stored collection.  Future generations won't keep your hard drives or DVDs or whatever.  Printing ensures you have a real copy.
Logged

Fike, Trailpixie, or Marc Shaffer
marcshaffer.net
TrailPixie.net

I carry an M43 ILC, a couple of good lenses, and a tripod.
Mark D Segal
Contributor
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6767


WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2013, 10:06:42 AM »
ReplyReply

I agree with this; one will still be able to enjoy photographs printed on paper long after all this technology we are now using has gone the way of the Dodo bird. But these days a great many people are no longer printing. Ctein's solution still makes sense as a safety measure usable over the medium term future.
Logged

Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml
fike
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1372


Hiker Photographer


WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 30, 2013, 10:09:32 AM »
ReplyReply

I was thinking about this article from Ctein's website. It has been very influential in my thinking.

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/eight-ways-to-preserve-your-pictures.html
Logged

Fike, Trailpixie, or Marc Shaffer
marcshaffer.net
TrailPixie.net

I carry an M43 ILC, a couple of good lenses, and a tripod.
rasterdogs
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 84


« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2013, 10:19:24 AM »
ReplyReply

The URL underlying your hot link seems to be missing a "t" right at the front of the string, which prevents it from working. At least did so on my computer. You may wish to verify.
This should do it:
Ctein on PSD's
Logged
kirkt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


« Reply #6 on: May 30, 2013, 12:37:25 PM »
ReplyReply

Here is the take on archival file formats from the dpbestflow folks (American Society of Media Photogrpahers, for the Library of Congress)

http://dpbestflow.org/node/371

kirk
Logged
Ben Rubinstein
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1707


« Reply #7 on: May 30, 2013, 12:52:12 PM »
ReplyReply

Here is the take on archival file formats from the dpbestflow folks (American Society of Media Photogrpahers, for the Library of Congress)

http://dpbestflow.org/node/371

kirk

I found that to be an interesting article.
Logged

Schewe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5255


WWW
« Reply #8 on: May 30, 2013, 02:21:16 PM »
ReplyReply

I've been saying pretty much the same thing about PSD files for years...this is my now somewhat famous (or infamous) response to a question of whether PDS or TIFF was a better file format...Why Use Tiff?
Logged
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7443



WWW
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2013, 02:56:12 PM »
ReplyReply

I've been saying pretty much the same thing about PSD files for years...this is my now somewhat famous (or infamous) response to a question of whether PDS or TIFF was a better file format...Why Use Tiff?
I've been listening to the Gospel according to Jeff Schewe long enough that I have never knowingly saved anything as a PSD.

Yet I still see frequent posts on LuLa from people worrying about the state of their PSDs.

I have a question for anybody willing to answer it: Why does anybody in this day and age use PSDs?

Bewildered,

Eric M.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Bryan Conner
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510


WWW
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2013, 11:33:22 PM »
ReplyReply

I've been listening to the Gospel according to Jeff Schewe long enough that I have never knowingly saved anything as a PSD.

Yet I still see frequent posts on LuLa from people worrying about the state of their PSDs.

I have a question for anybody willing to answer it: Why does anybody in this day and age use PSDs?

Bewildered,

Eric M.




The only reason why I occasionally use a psd file is by mistake.  When I discover the mistake, I reopen, resave as a tiff and delete the psd file.  The info in the thread that Jeff linked to above killed psd use for me.
Logged

artobest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 257


WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 01, 2013, 02:12:47 PM »
ReplyReply

I was thinking about this article from Ctein's website. It has been very influential in my thinking.

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/eight-ways-to-preserve-your-pictures.html

To be clear, this is Mike Johnston's website, for which Ctein is a regular guest blogger. The post linked to is written by Johnston, not Ctein. Now carry on! Smiley
Logged

john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2448



WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2013, 02:31:41 PM »
ReplyReply

To be clear, this is Mike Johnston's website, for which Ctein is a regular guest blogger. The post linked to is written by Johnston, not Ctein. Now carry on! Smiley

Oh yeah?
"This week's column by Ctein"
"2013 by Ctein, all rights reserved"
Logged

hjulenissen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1615


« Reply #13 on: June 01, 2013, 02:40:18 PM »
ReplyReply

Is there anything in Adobes license forbidding me from setting up a webserver that accepts PSD files and returns tiff files (running a regular Adobe CC app)?

-h
Logged
Michael Bailey
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 109


« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2013, 10:35:10 AM »
ReplyReply

Why use Tiff? No reason not to. But I haven't given up on PSD quite yet. Because:

 -big 16-bit PSD files open and save much faster than Zip Tiffs. (Granted, I haven't tested this in a while, but when I did the difference was significant.) With the fast processors and gobs of RAM available these days, the opening and saving of files has become, by elimination, my biggest processing bottleneck.
 -when I see a PSD file in a folder on my computer, I know that it's the main, full resolution, working version of a photo. Of course, that has nothing to do with the quality of the format. It's just part of a system that evolved as an easy shorthand for my purposes. (Raw files in one folder called, aptly, "Raw." PSD working files in another folder called, "PSD." Final TIFFs for delivery in a third folder called, "to deliver.")
 -when the Photoshop apocalypse is imminent, I'll do what Ctein suggests. Until then, I'm not sure there's a big hurry. When I installed Lightroom, I had to re-save all my "un-maximized" Photoshop files to satisfy its limitations, and that was a frustrating pain in the neck, but I got through it. Now I have Lightroom itself, and other tools, to make the job pretty easy.

Long story short, I don't think file format choice has to be an all-or-nothing decision, and not one I have to make today.
Logged
artobest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 257


WWW
« Reply #15 on: June 03, 2013, 05:40:20 AM »
ReplyReply

Oh yeah?
"This week's column by Ctein"
"2013 by Ctein, all rights reserved"

I meant the article linked to by fike and quoted in my post.

Love your puerile response, by the way.
Logged

john beardsworth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2448



WWW
« Reply #16 on: June 03, 2013, 06:29:06 AM »
ReplyReply

Not puerile, just misguided. Wink
Logged

HSakols
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 347


« Reply #17 on: June 03, 2013, 07:55:05 AM »
ReplyReply

Yikes!  So I have to admit, I got a lot of PSD's.  Does someone have an action or something to convert them to TIFF's? 
Logged
BobShomler
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #18 on: June 03, 2013, 08:49:58 AM »
ReplyReply

Photoshop's image Processor can be fast and easy:  Open folder of psds in Bridge.  Select all or desired psd files to be saved as tiff files.  Then: Tools > Photoshop > Image Processor.  Check 'Save as TIFF' under File Type in the Image Processor dialog box, also check Include ICC profile under Preferences.(assuming you want this). Decide where to save tiffs -- if you select 'Save in Same Location' a folder named TIFF will be created and tiffs saved there.
Logged
Mark D Segal
Contributor
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6767


WWW
« Reply #19 on: June 03, 2013, 09:02:44 AM »
ReplyReply

I presume these do not replace the PSDs, but simply add the new files?
Logged

Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml
Pages: [1] 2 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad