Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: One SSD Vs. Two In RAID: Which Is Better?  (Read 1083 times)
Gregs
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« on: June 06, 2013, 06:06:30 PM »
ReplyReply

Thought this would be of interest: See link to article on Tom's Guide

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-raid-benchmark,3485.html
Logged
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7902



WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2013, 10:11:32 PM »
ReplyReply

It makes sense. In the end, simplicity is almost always the best option for global productivity.

Even if you were to save a few sec at each open with a Raid 0, think how the time you will waster when the raid array goes wrong (not "if", "when").

cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6802


« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2013, 01:50:17 AM »
ReplyReply

Thought this would be of interest: See link to article on Tom's Guide

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-raid-benchmark,3485.html

Thanks for the article… Interesting, as it goes beyond synthetic benchmarks.
Logged

Francois
Justan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1875


WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2013, 09:19:49 AM »
ReplyReply

Another thanks for the post.

The article was well done but unfortunately limited in scope. Even still, they showed as has other similar tests that a single higher capacity SSD will outperform a raid 0 array using 2 smaller capacity drives. This is not really news.

I’d love to see a similar test but done to show optimal raid 5 array using SSD. RAID 5 arrays do not deliver a notable speed gain until there are at least 4 drives in the array. I dunno if SSD drives would aid or hinder this kind of array, but generally with RAID 5 one gets redundancy, and with enough drives in place, significantly increased performance.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad