Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: 10 ND or not to 10 ND  (Read 898 times)
Slim
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 166


WWW
« on: June 25, 2013, 12:28:52 AM »
ReplyReply

This one...


OR this one...


« Last Edit: June 28, 2013, 11:00:25 AM by Slim » Logged

ErikKaffehr
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 6911


WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2013, 12:32:15 AM »
ReplyReply

Hi,

Both have merits but I prefer the one without ND10.

Best regards
Erik

This one...


OR this one...




Logged

francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6432


« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2013, 02:18:14 AM »
ReplyReply

Both are nice but I don't see anything better or more pleasing with the 10 stop ND so, in this case, I would keep the filter-less photo.
Logged

Francois
OnlyNorth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 263


« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2013, 02:45:11 AM »
ReplyReply

I like "this one".
All the best.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2013, 12:36:05 AM by OnlyNorth » Logged
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2389


« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2013, 02:58:54 AM »
ReplyReply

My preference is the second one. I shoot a lot of 10 stop so I am biased?
Logged

kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3669



« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2013, 03:21:47 AM »
ReplyReply

The first. I agree with François: the blurring from the long exposure really adds little to the shot, and in some ways (the clouds in particular) detracts from it.

I might be tempted to combine the two: keep the sky from the first and use the water from the second. That's getting close to manipulation, though, which as we now know is unethical  Wink.

Jeremy
Logged
Paulo Bizarro
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1296


WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2013, 03:24:27 AM »
ReplyReply

I prefer the first one, nicer sky for me. The filter does nothing to the water of interest.
Logged
Roman Racela
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 224



« Reply #7 on: June 25, 2013, 08:21:17 PM »
ReplyReply

I like both images, but if the scene was shot at sunrise or sunset with better clouds then sans 10-stop ND would be kickass.
Logged
fike
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1372


Hiker Photographer


WWW
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2013, 07:47:34 AM »
ReplyReply

I think the question is not whether to ND or not to ND. Neither make the composition excellent. The shot is a nice memory, but it doesn't contain anything that goes beyond a pretty nice snapshot (the lighting is conspiring against you). So, I would tend to lean towards a style that is more straight--that is without the motion blur in the sky and water. 
Logged

Fike, Trailpixie, or Marc Shaffer
marcshaffer.net
TrailPixie.net

I carry an M43 ILC, a couple of good lenses, and a tripod.
DwayneOakes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 355



« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2013, 09:35:20 AM »
ReplyReply

Can I have the second image with the first image sky in it ? lol Both are great but in this case the first one
for me. The second one would have been great as a tight crop of just the stream and the forest line
with the ND filter. You get some great reflections on the water doing that. Look at the second image there
is some great reflections from the mountain tops. When you are at scenes like this it is a good idea
to look for more images in the main image etc, explore the scene with your lens not your feet (walking around) sort of speak.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2013, 09:39:50 AM by DwayneOakes » Logged

thierrylegros396
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 602


« Reply #10 on: June 26, 2013, 10:16:19 AM »
ReplyReply

Prefer the second, especialy as the WB seems to be slightly different and too "hot" in the first one.

Thierry
Logged
Larry Heath
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 139


« Reply #11 on: June 26, 2013, 07:47:44 PM »
ReplyReply

I like the second hands down, and walking away! Nothing wrong with the first, I just get that old timey feel on the second.

Later Larry

Logged
Slim
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 166


WWW
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2013, 11:07:20 AM »
ReplyReply

Mixed reviews apparently.  My wife says they are nothing special, but I like them.
I reprocessed the first picture to have higher exposures in certain areas of the picture.  You can see the original one I posted in the first reply... I think.

The lighting is coming from the side which adds some "harshness" to it, but I think that harshness gives the mountain character.

The photo was taken around 6:30 AM in Yosemite Valley.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad