Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Sunburst  (Read 1024 times)
churly
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 537


« on: July 15, 2013, 07:21:00 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for taking a look.  CC welcome.
Chuck

« Last Edit: July 15, 2013, 08:39:17 PM by churly » Logged

Chuck Hurich
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7870



WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2013, 10:14:45 PM »
ReplyReply

Nice capture!

Eric M.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3930



« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2013, 02:35:02 AM »
ReplyReply

Yes, very good. You've even controlled the inevitable, small area of blown-out cloud so that it's inoffensive.

Jeremy
Logged
sdwilsonsct
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1630


« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2013, 02:46:39 AM »
ReplyReply

Very nice!
Logged

Paulo Bizarro
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542


WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2013, 03:08:44 AM »
ReplyReply

I like the sky area, well done. I do not like the way the hills and the foreground came out, it seems to me that the shadows were lifted too much, rendering them in a sort of mushy and greyish tones.
Logged
churly
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 537


« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2013, 07:36:44 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for the comments!

Paulo - I have the same feeling.  I tried leaving the foreground darker but didn't like that much.  I did bracket this shot so I 'll go back and see if I call do a better job on the hills and foreground and blend that in.  The clouds were moving too much to work on the whole image. Thanks for the input.

Chuck
Logged

Chuck Hurich
churly
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 537


« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2013, 06:41:14 PM »
ReplyReply

Here is another effort that gives more life to the foreground and hills.
Improvement?

Chuck
Logged

Chuck Hurich
sdwilsonsct
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1630


« Reply #7 on: July 17, 2013, 02:32:31 AM »
ReplyReply

I understand the suggestion, but for my taste there is enough foreground light in the first version.
Logged

Paulo Bizarro
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542


WWW
« Reply #8 on: July 17, 2013, 03:11:01 AM »
ReplyReply

I prefer the second version, the photo is a bit more lively.
Logged
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3930



« Reply #9 on: July 18, 2013, 02:26:29 AM »
ReplyReply

The foreground light in the second version makes it look, to my eye, unbalanced.

Jeremy
Logged
churly
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 537


« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2013, 03:34:30 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for the feedback guys.  Maybe I can back off on the light in the foreground but retain the color.
Chuck
Logged

Chuck Hurich
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3930



« Reply #11 on: July 18, 2013, 04:36:36 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for the feedback guys.  Maybe I can back off on the light in the foreground but retain the color.
Chuck

I'd be interested to see what you manage to do.

Jeremy
Logged
MTGFender
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 581


« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2013, 07:39:51 AM »
ReplyReply

Light and the scenery are gorgeous! Another fantastic one.
Pramote
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad