Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: D800 vs. D800E for aerial photography  (Read 5501 times)
Atina
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 40


« on: July 19, 2013, 07:02:15 AM »
ReplyReply

Theoretically, or maybe also practically, in your view, which one is best suited for this kind of job?

I've seen people recommend both and one photographer use D800.

Nikon says for more controlled situations, studio work for example, use D800E, and since a helicopter is many things, but not a studio, what other considerations are there?
Logged
BartvanderWolf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3404


« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2013, 07:50:52 AM »
ReplyReply

Theoretically, or maybe also practically, in your view, which one is best suited for this kind of job?

I've seen people recommend both and one photographer use D800.

Nikon says for more controlled situations, studio work for example, use D800E, and since a helicopter is many things, but not a studio, what other considerations are there?

Hi,

It will be difficult to see any difference in the resulting files, so you might as well save some money (it's better spent on good lenses).

Actually, many Raw converters seem to deal slightly more elegant with the demosaicing of the D800 files, from what I've seen sofar. You will also run a bit less of a risk that some regular pattern urban structures (if that is what you'll shoot) will result in aliasing artifacts. Shooting retakes is expensive, and the weather may not allow to.

Cheers,
Bart
Logged
PhotoEcosse
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 561



« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2013, 11:07:58 AM »
ReplyReply

As I have mentioned before on this chat room, I have both and seriously can't tell the difference.

So I would second Bart's suggestion. Spend the 300 on beer.
Logged

************************************
"Reality is an illusion caused by lack of alcohol."
Alternatively, "Life begins at the far end of your comfort zone."
Harold Clark
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2013, 12:08:19 PM »
ReplyReply

As I have mentioned before on this chat room, I have both and seriously can't tell the difference.

So I would second Bart's suggestion. Spend the 300 on beer.

Not just before you fly though. Grin
Logged
MichaelEzra
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 649



WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2013, 10:18:44 PM »
ReplyReply

Considering that aerial shooting involves inevitable camera shake, I do not see the case where difference between D800 vs D800e will be significant.
D800e should give you a slight edge in other applications, but unlikely in aerial photography.

Coming from AA-less meduim format experience, I am very happy to use the -e version for any type of photography.
In general, aliasing with D800e NEF files using RawTherapee / Amaze demosaic is not a problem, (unless one is trying to find how to find it).


Logged

BartvanderWolf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3404


« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2013, 02:46:54 AM »
ReplyReply

Considering that aerial shooting involves inevitable camera shake, I do not see the case where difference between D800 vs D800e will be significant.
D800e should give you a slight edge in other applications, but unlikely in aerial photography.

Hi Michael,

Indeed, camera shake/vibration was also one of my considerations, but there are also things like haze and air turbulence should one be able to expose long enough.

Quote
Coming from AA-less meduim format experience, I am very happy to use the -e version for any type of photography.
In general, aliasing with D800e NEF files using RawTherapee / Amaze demosaic is not a problem, (unless one is trying to find how to find it).

While that may be true, it also depends on the subject matter that one shoots. The small sensels and inevitable Capture blur (motion/lens/diffraction) will all 'help' to reduce the aliasing risk. However, for aerial photography (using wider apertures to keep exposure times high) diffraction will be minimized.  And shooting certain urban structures from a distance at oblique angles, can produce repetitive structures with very high spatial frequency detail. Since air time is expensive, and the time window for good light may be limited, I'd avoid the risk.

Cheers,
Bart
« Last Edit: July 20, 2013, 02:49:12 AM by BartvanderWolf » Logged
Dave_Wyatt
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14



WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2013, 05:36:01 AM »
ReplyReply

Get the D800.  I over thought this for ages last year and ended up with a D800 and couldn't be happier.  The key is to get decent lenses -and this often means avoiding Nikon.  Use Zeiss or Leica glass and you will be fine.  The advantages of the 'e' version will become invisible in print in normal conditions, and when working from the air the slightest bit of atmospheric haze will completely negate any difference.  You may also run into the not insignificant moire issue if photographing man made structures form the air so again, the D800 wouold be better suited for the job.
Logged

Landscape into Photo: http://www.landscapeintophoto.com
Custom ICC Profiling Service: http://www.customprofiles.co.uk
Portfolio site: http://www.davewyatt.co.uk
SeanBK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 493


« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2013, 03:33:15 PM »
ReplyReply

I have shot extensively with D800E during travel. Fabrics, silks, Intricate repeating grillwork but my daughter took my pic of me & my grand daughter, I was wearing regular Polo by RL and saw a lil bit of Moire, but that is just so..o rare. I have friends, good photographers shooting with D800 and I can tell which r mine & which r theirs. Quality better in D800E. Good glass a must.
Logged
stevebri
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 164


« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2013, 02:09:26 PM »
ReplyReply

You get more unsharp or slightly blurred shots using a D800/E than a smaller pixel led camera, it's just the nature of cramming pixels onto a chip, the Phase One 160/260 (80mp) is similar.

I'd consider the d600, see what Scott Kelby did and why..... Though I don't think he shoots aerial... Smiley


Steve
Logged
Petrus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


« Reply #9 on: September 16, 2013, 05:12:01 AM »
ReplyReply

The key is to get decent lenses -and this often means avoiding Nikon.  Use Zeiss or Leica glass and you will be fine. 

If DxO Mark lens database is to be believed the above does not hold water: Best Zeiss for Nikon is #10, bettered by Nikkors and Sigma.

DxO has not tested Leica glass.
Logged
Niels_Patrick
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 40


WWW
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2013, 10:42:26 AM »
ReplyReply

I made some pictures with 2 d800 and one D800e - out of a helicpoter. Frankfurt Germany Skyline.
You can check it out on my website:

www.geisselbrecht.biz

Speaking about quality ... is hard to tell the differnce. If your workflow is fine d800 is superb.


Logged

_______________________
www.geisselbrecht.biz
Niels_Patrick
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 40


WWW
« Reply #11 on: October 01, 2013, 10:44:39 AM »
ReplyReply

one complaining is .... the black shaddows are a bit noisy against the sun.... maybe I will switch to a d4 next time and do stitching...
Logged

_______________________
www.geisselbrecht.biz
Rory
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 156


« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2013, 07:46:28 PM »
ReplyReply

You won't be able to tell the difference between the D800 and D800E.  Here are a few aerial tips in case you have not done this before.

o  shoot through an open window.  You can use LV to compose if the viewing angle is awkward.
o  use a zoom like the 24-70.  Changing lenses in a helicoptor is a pain.
o  bring two cameras with different lenses if you can.  Redundancy and quicker to change cameras then change lenses.
o  shoot at 1/500 sec or higher.
o  tape your hood to the lens as the wind drag can be significant when you stick the lens out the window.

Good luck
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad