Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Sigma 50-500  (Read 501 times)
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3910



« on: August 16, 2013, 01:05:52 PM »
ReplyReply

Anyone tried this (the newish one, with IS)? Any thoughts? It's a lot cheaper, and with a little more range than the Canon 100-400. I'd be using it with a 5d2, at least initially, mostly for wildlife.

Jeremy
Logged
wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5698



WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2013, 02:30:06 PM »
ReplyReply

Everything is of course relative, but a friend of mine has one and he seems quite happy with it.  I'll ask him for his thoughts, but he's away at the moment.

Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
Philip Weber
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 180


« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2013, 06:59:56 PM »
ReplyReply

I have had the newer OS version for a couple of years and have found it to be a very good lens. I shoot Nikon, so it's been paired with a D300, D700, D7000 and most recently with my primary body, the D800.

It's not a fast lens, nor, from a Nikon user standpoint, optically on par with their new 80-400 but with greater range and $1,000 less, one really has to want the Nikkor. As I already have the Sigma, I've so far passed on the 80-400, at least until the price comes down. If discounted enough, I imagine NAS would kick in! 

I suspect that better optics is true with Canon's 100-400 as well but I cannot say that from personal experience and again, the Sigma has more range and a better price point.

Given decent light though, I've found the auto focus to be very responsive and the OS is worth 3 stops (+/- 1/2 stop).

At approx. 4 pounds, it's not light or small but its versatility and generally good optics are unmatched by any other lens that I'm aware of, especially at that price point.

I hope this helps,
Phil
Logged
stever
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1062


« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2013, 08:04:51 PM »
ReplyReply

when I look at B&H prices the "new" Bigma and 100-400 are virtually the same price.  I have a lot of experience with the 100-400 on crop and FF Canon's and am pretty satisfied with the FF results (5D2 &3) up to 17x27 prints but generally don't expect to print larger than 13x19 from crop frame.

i'm pretty skeptical of anything with a 10:1 zoom ratio, but Roger at lensrentals.com gives the Sigma a thumbs up.  i'd also be concerned with lens - lens variation (which was an issue with earlier 100-400s but seems to be resolved) with the 10:1 zoom.

it looks like the 100-400 is finally going to be replaced within the next year or so, but i'd expect the successor to carry a higher price along with improved IQ
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad