Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 [2]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Critiques by Reichmann?  (Read 10286 times)
macgyver
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510


« Reply #20 on: December 13, 2005, 12:39:53 PM »
ReplyReply

On the original topic, didn't Mr. Reichmann once state that he stopped doing the critiques becuase of the volume he was getting?  Something like that?  I'm not sure when or where I got that, so I may be off, but I swear I remember that.



Kaelaria, you are not helping your case.
Logged
kaelaria
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2225



WWW
« Reply #21 on: December 13, 2005, 12:51:46 PM »
ReplyReply

I don't have a case - I'm just laughing!
Logged

David Mantripp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 686


WWW
« Reply #22 on: December 14, 2005, 02:11:46 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: pom,Dec 14 2005, 12:04 AM
My original response was this:

"Is it too much to refer to him as Michael or Mr Reichmann?"

Well, you see, in fact, strictly speaking, it wasn't.  You're technically telling a bit of a porkie here.  Lighten up fer crissakes. You're really making a fool of yourself. As if jumping on a perfectly innocent first post by a non-native speaker wasn't enough.

Here, in Switzerland, it would be extremely disrespectful to use somebody's first name without being invited to do so.  Different cultures have different standards.  I really doubt that Michael would want you to go on such a crusade for him.
Logged

--
David Mantripp
http://www.snowhenge.net
DarkPenguin
Guest
« Reply #23 on: December 14, 2005, 03:27:55 PM »
ReplyReply

Clearly you haven't read the anti-Reichmann threads over at dpreview.com.
Logged
Ben Rubinstein
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1733


« Reply #24 on: December 14, 2005, 03:45:21 PM »
ReplyReply

It was word for word my initial response minus a spelling mistake on one letter. Don't be obnoxious by implying that I lied.

I can't read the initial post as 'jumping on someone' it was an observation based on exactly those threads in Dpreview and other places that Dark Penguin mentioned.
« Last Edit: December 14, 2005, 03:50:36 PM by pom » Logged

macgyver
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 510


« Reply #25 on: December 14, 2005, 04:47:58 PM »
ReplyReply

Out of curiosity,  what threads to you refer to?
Logged
Ben Rubinstein
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1733


« Reply #26 on: December 14, 2005, 05:42:40 PM »
ReplyReply

Whenever MR writes an article that is not totally picture orientated then he seems to be slammed on DPreview, FM and other forums for being totally digital biased to the point of blindness to it's faults, that he is a paid lackey of Canon, that his pictures are mediocre and he wouldn't have a voice in the market place if he didn't have apparent millions to spend on equipment and trips, etc, etc and it's always 'Reichman is this, 'Reichman is that', it's certainly used in an offensive manner there.
Logged

eleanorbrown
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 612


WWW
« Reply #27 on: December 14, 2005, 06:18:51 PM »
ReplyReply

This is quite honestly, the most bizarre thread I have ever read.  Everyone go out and shoot some images. Eleanor


Quote
Whenever MR writes an article that is not totally picture orientated then he seems to be slammed on DPreview, FM and other forums for being totally digital biased to the point of blindness to it's faults, that he is a paid lackey of Canon, that his pictures are mediocre and he wouldn't have a voice in the market place if he didn't have apparent millions to spend on equipment and trips, etc, etc and it's always 'Reichman is this, 'Reichman is that', it's certainly used in an offensive manner there.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=53558\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Logged

kaelaria
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2225



WWW
« Reply #28 on: December 14, 2005, 06:31:57 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Whenever MR writes an article that is not totally picture orientated then he seems to be slammed on DPreview, FM and other forums for being totally digital biased to the point of blindness to it's faults, that he is a paid lackey of Canon, that his pictures are mediocre and he wouldn't have a voice in the market place if he didn't have apparent millions to spend on equipment and trips, etc, etc and it's always 'Reichman is this, 'Reichman is that', it's certainly used in an offensive manner there.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=53558\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]



LOL

LIGHTEN UP FRANCIS!!
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7790



WWW
« Reply #29 on: December 15, 2005, 10:40:52 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
This is quite honestly, the most bizarre thread I have ever read.  Everyone go out and shoot some images. Eleanor
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=53560\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
DISCLAIMER: This response is not meant as a serious comment.  
It is an attempt to reach the level that this thread has risen and/or fallen to.

Eleanor,
  I wanted to shoot some images, but the gallery owner wouldn't let me in with my Uzi!    

(signed) Not me; somebody else.  
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Ben Rubinstein
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1733


« Reply #30 on: December 15, 2005, 12:16:12 PM »
ReplyReply

Just been putting up a bunch of images for exhibition, have banged my thumb four times with the hammer and the guy wants 10 extra pictures in the back room should he run out (I wish!). Sigh....
Logged

Pages: « 1 [2]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad