Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Google indexing  (Read 4075 times)
jani
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1604



WWW
« on: December 27, 2005, 07:18:59 PM »
ReplyReply

I just noticed while searching Google for earlier occurences of the term "gigage" that one of the primary hits was in the same discussion that I was responding to, right here on the Luminous Landscape discussion board.

The earlier installation blocked Google searches, I think, while this one seems not to.

Now I don't mind being able to search with Google, on the contrary, but I think this is something that should be considered carefully.

If this is desirable, then Michael should probably reconsider his policy of publishing his email address as-is in the forums, since this increases the likelyhood of spam at that address. As should we all ...

Thoughts, comments?
Logged

Jan
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4915



« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2005, 09:06:51 PM »
ReplyReply

Huh?

Michael
Logged
jani
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1604



WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2005, 03:42:37 AM »
ReplyReply

Spammers use, among other things, Google to search for valid email addresses they can send spam and viruses to. It's very cost efficient for them.
Logged

Jan
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4915



« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2005, 06:55:54 AM »
ReplyReply

Yes, everyone knows that.

But, if I didn't publish my email address, how would people get in touch with me?

In any event, between my ISPs smap filters and my own I only receive about 3-4 spams in my inbox each day.

Michael
Logged
kbolin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 220



WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2005, 12:16:25 PM »
ReplyReply

If the e-mail address is posted as text then it can easily be retrieved by various methods most notably being "web robots" that scan web pages for the @ sign and the web page.  Having this they believe they have an e-mail address.

Using an image with the address in it then the action is simply a mailto: function.  The contents of the image can not be read.

Kelly
Logged

jani
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1604



WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2005, 03:06:45 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
If the e-mail address is posted as text then it can easily be retrieved by various methods most notably being "web robots" that scan web pages for the @ sign and the web page.  Having this they believe they have an e-mail address.

Using an image with the address in it then the action is simply a mailto: function.  The contents of the image can not be read.
Also, the "contact us" feature in the LL webshop works extremely well.

I know it doesn't have quite the same convenience as a mailto link or a posted, non-obfuscated email address, but it certainly does the job.

I've had my email address posted on the web for over a decade (but not for the past year or two), and I receive so much spam that I simply cannot use my regular email address (@ifi.uio.no: jani, BTW), but instead have to supply per-contact email addresses (e.g. jani+usethis@ ...) so that people can easily reach me. I really don't want anybody else to have to resort to similar measures, it's pretty inconvenient.
Logged

Jan
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad