Forum Login

Wimberley Head

This accessory will be featured in Issue #4 of The Video Journal due out in April, 2002.

Don't Gamble — Get a Gimbal

If you are considering the use of a really large telephoto lens — a 400mm f/2.8, 500mm f/4 or a 600mm f/4 — then a ballhead (even the largest) simply won't do. You need a gimbal head. 

This has everything to do with gravity. With a ballhead the lens / camera combination rests on a point — the ball. If the camera is tilted upwards or downwards, such as when following a bird in flight, or even when simply panning to reposition, the whole assembly will tilt forward or back under its own weight. This is inherently unstable and can lead to a big expensive lens ending face-down in the dirt.

With a gimbal mount the entire weight is hung rather than balanced, and it consequently remains extremely stable. A 15lb camera / lens combination can be panned and tilted with a single finger, and because the horizontal and vertical axis are separate they can be locked independently.

CAD Drawing Illustration courtesy Wimberley

I've been using the smaller Wimberley Sidekick for a couple of years with my Canon 300mm f/2.8L IS, and it has proven to be excellent. It's convenient as well because it is simply an add-on to my existing Arca-Swiss B1 head. But, with a larger lens like my Pentax 600mm f/4 or anything similar, the full Wimberley is what's needed.

The Wimberley mount costs USD $465, and you'll need to spend another $100 for an Arca-Swiss compatible quick-release clamp assembly. Not inexpensive, but if you've just spent $5,000 to $10,000 for a long and heavy lens this additional investment to make it properly functional shouldn't be a concern.

Wimberley is a small family owned business. They make a high quality product and sell it at a fair price. I've now dealt with them a couple of times and on each occasion I've found them to be both friendly and to provide quick service.

The Wimberley has, to my knowledge, only one significant competitor, the Kirk King Cobra. I have no experience with this mount, so I can't comment on it other than to note that unlike the Wimberley it suspends the lens from the side, rather than the Wimberley design which allows the lens to sit on a platform. This made it unsuitable for my purposes, because the Pentax 600 doesn't have a rotating tripod collar. Any lens without such a rotating mount will similarly not work with the Kirk. At $440 the Kirk is somewhat less expensive than the Wimberley. This price includes the quick release. 

There is one other gimbal head that I'm aware of, the DPNP Action Head 2000 from Reis. I've never seen one in use and know nothing else about it other than what's on the Reis website. Like the King Cobra it too is a side-mount design.  It sells for $472 including the quick release.

Finally, keep in mind that when you use the large Wimberley head you are dedicating the tripod to the use of large lenses. With the smaller Wimberley Sidekick you simply remove the arm and your ballhead is instantly returned to its normal use. 


Filed Under:  

show page metadata

Concepts: Camera, Photographic lens, Pentax, Single-lens reflex camera, Telephoto lens, Photography, Asahiflex, Photographic lens design

Entities: Pentax, Canon, Michael Reichmann, Wimberley, Kirk, Reis

Tags: Wimberley, smaller wimberley sidekick, gimbal head, King Cobra, Wimberley mount costs, quick release, large telephoto lens, big expensive lens, large wimberley head, Arca-Swiss B1 head, Wimberley design, Arca-Swiss compatible quick-release, Kirk King Cobra, larger lens, lens combination, heavy lens, DPNP Action Head, high quality product, camera, gimbal mount, camera combination, inherently unstable, tripod collar, vertical axis, single finger, entire weight, significant competitor, quick service, additional investment, Reis website, clamp assembly, fair price, small family, side-mount design, large lenses, Pentax, telephoto, balanced, inexpensive, ball